Skip to main content

Security report for schoellerallibert.com

Schoeller Allibert · Manufacturing · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Schoeller Allibert is a leading provider of reusable plastic packaging and logistics solutions, serving diverse industries such as food, automotive, beverages, cosmetics, pharma, chemicals, retail, and industrial manufacturing. The company emphasizes sustainability, innovation, and efficiency, positioning itself as a key player in the circular economy. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and multi-language support, targeting business customers seeking sustainable packaging solutions. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks like Next.js and React, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and implements strong security practices including HTTPS and consent management. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration status, though the professional branding and association with the Brookfield group support legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is strong with room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schoellerallibert.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and transport sectors, focusing on reusable transport packaging (RTP) and smart logistics solutions such as SmartLink for asset tracking. Its business model centers on sustainability and innovation, offering durable, foldable, and hygienic packaging products. The presence of investor relations and media center sections indicates a large enterprise with public or investor-facing communications. The parent company, Brookfield, adds credibility and financial backing. The website's extensive content and multi-regional language support suggest a global market reach. The company targets industries requiring efficient and sustainable packaging, leveraging technology to enhance supply chain visibility and reduce environmental impact.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced, secure forms requiring privacy consent, and use of a consent management platform. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security are present, enhancing protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a public security policy, vulnerability disclosure program, or incident response contact information indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and incident response preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Include data protection officer contact details to enhance GDPR compliance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Schoeller Allibert Services B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Schoeller Allibert
Description
Schoeller Allibert is the leading provider of reusable plastic packaging and cost-effective logistics solutions for various industries, including food, automotive, beverages, cosmetics, pharma, chemicals, retail, system integrators, industrial manufacturing, and pooling.
Key services
Reusable transport packaging, Logistics solutions, SmartLink asset tracking, Sustainable packaging design
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Consent Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Leadinfo
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with privacy terms checkbox
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management platform

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Visual Website Optimizer, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Consent Manager, Leadinfo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on sustainability and reusable transport packaging
  3. Multiple language alternates and hreflang tags present
  4. Comprehensive navigation with industry, product, innovation, sustainability, and about us sections
  5. Contact form collects personal data with privacy terms consent checkbox
  6. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  7. No visible security or WAF blocking mechanisms
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring server-side rendering and good performance. It uses Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, and multiple tracking pixels for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and hreflang attributes for internationalization. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the presence of multiple CDN and analytics services suggests a robust infrastructure. Performance appears fast with preloading and optimized images. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require continuous security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schoellerallibert.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schoellerallibert.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.