Skip to main content

Security report for schmitz-wila.com

SCHMITZ-WILA GmbH · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SCHMITZ-WILA GmbH is a medium-sized German manufacturing company specializing in advanced lighting solutions, including multifunctional linear light systems and LED lighting products tailored for architectural and commercial projects. The company targets architects, project planners, and commercial clients, offering product brochures, project references, and consultation services. Their market position is that of a specialized niche player with a consistent and professional brand presence. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes responsive design and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements. Strategic recommendations include enhancing DNS security and publishing formal security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of schmitz-wila.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schmitz-wila.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a B2B business model focused on manufacturing and project-based lighting solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in offering integrated lighting systems that harmonize with architectural designs, supported by detailed product documentation and multimedia content. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and active social media engagement. Partnerships such as with Brand Corner indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include regular content updates and product launches. The company maintains clear contact channels and a professional image, supporting sustained market presence in the manufacturing sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR. However, the absence of DNSSEC and certain security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the analyzed content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and CleverReach is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SCHMITZ-WILA GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SCHMITZ-WILA GmbH
Description
Manufacturer and provider of advanced lighting solutions including multifunctional linear light systems, LED lighting, and integrated lighting concepts for architectural and commercial projects.
Key services
Lighting product manufacturing, Project lighting solutions, Custom lighting integration, Product brochures and catalogs, Consultation and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, JavaScript, Slick Slider, Google Tag Manager, jQuery
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of client-side consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
CleverReach (newsletter service)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and professionally designed.
  2. Content is primarily in German with English alternate versions.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with clear options and explanations.
  4. Multiple product brochures and videos are available for download and viewing.
  5. Contact information is prominently displayed including phone and physical address.
  6. Social media presence on Instagram and LinkedIn is linked.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in the HTML content.
  10. Use of modern CMS TYPO3 and standard web technologies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags, and CleverReach manages newsletter subscriptions. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features such as skip links and alt attributes. Performance is moderate, with compressed CSS and JS assets. The domain is registered with COREhub, S.R.L., and uses multiple authoritative name servers but lacks DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schmitz-wila.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schmitz-wila.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.