Skip to main content

Security report for schmetterling-support.de

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website schmetterling.de/support/ presents a minimalistic and nearly empty page with only a title and a heading indicating 'Schmetterling Technologie Support'. There is no substantive content, metadata, or contact information available, which severely limits the ability to assess the business or its services. The domain WHOIS data is heavily restricted by DENIC, providing no registrar, creation, or expiry dates, and no registrant information, which further complicates trust evaluation. The lack of HTTPS confirmation and absence of security or privacy policies indicate a low security posture and poor compliance with modern web standards. Technically, the website lacks any detectable frameworks, scripts, or CMS, and no external links or social media presence are found. The site appears to be either a placeholder or under development, with poor design, accessibility, and SEO characteristics. Security headers and SSL configuration details are missing, suggesting potential vulnerabilities or at least a lack of security hardening. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers, combined with no visible privacy or cookie policies, results in a very low security score. The WHOIS data's lack of transparency and minimal website content reduce the domain's legitimacy score. No signs of adult or unsafe content are present, and the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms. Overall, the site is not currently suitable for professional or customer-facing use. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, providing clear contact and business information, and improving website content and technical SEO to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schmetterling-support.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the minimal content and lack of business details on the website, it is not possible to derive meaningful business intelligence. The domain appears to be associated with a technology-related entity named 'Schmetterling', but no further information about market positioning, business model, or services is available. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators. The lack of contact details and company information suggests the site is either inactive, under construction, or not intended for public business engagement at this time.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS usage or SSL/TLS certificates, no security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies to indicate compliance with GDPR or other regulations. The WHOIS data is restricted, providing no registrant transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. These factors collectively indicate a low maturity level in security practices, exposing the site and potentially its users to risks. The absence of security best practices and contact channels for abuse or security incidents further exacerbates the risk profile.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data in transit.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents.
  4. Enhance website content with meaningful business information and improve SEO and accessibility.
  5. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is extremely minimal with only a title and heading.
  2. No metadata, no forms, no external links, no contact info found.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No scripts or technologies detected in the HTML head.
  5. WHOIS data is restricted by DENIC with no registrar or registrant info.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration data provided.
  7. No social media or external domains linked.
  8. No advertising or analytics tools detected.
  9. Website appears to be a placeholder or under construction.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a very basic HTML structure with no metadata, scripts, or external resources detected. There is no CMS or framework identified. The hosting provider and platform are unknown due to lack of technical headers or DNS details beyond nameservers. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but are likely poor given the minimal content and lack of responsive design elements. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features, indicating technical debt and a need for modernization to meet current web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schmetterling-support.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schmetterling-support.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.