Skip to main content

Security report for schlage.co.nz

Schlage · Manufacturing · New Zealand

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Schlage New Zealand operates as a reputable manufacturer and retailer of door hardware and smart locks, serving homeowners and businesses with precision-built security products. The website reflects a mature digital presence consistent with its 2006 domain registration and affiliation with parent company Allegion. The site is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google reCAPTCHA to provide a secure and user-friendly experience. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and form protections in place, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schlage.co.nz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the manufacturing and retail sector for door hardware and smart locks in New Zealand. Its business model focuses on product innovation and customer support, targeting residential and commercial customers. The website's structured navigation and content indicate a focus on product education and customer engagement. The parent company Allegion's involvement adds credibility and resources. Social media integration and marketing tools like Adobe Launch and PriceSpider suggest active digital marketing efforts. The absence of exposed vulnerabilities and presence of privacy compliance measures indicate operational maturity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documents are not publicly available, which could enhance transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Continue monitoring privacy compliance and update policies as regulations evolve.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Schlage
Description
Schlage door levers, hardware and smart locks are built with precision and innovation.
Key services
Door hardware manufacturing, Smart lock solutions, Product information and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA, Adobe Launch (Tag Manager), PriceSpider widget
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Launch (likely Adobe Analytics)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch, Google reCAPTCHA, PriceSpider
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch Tag Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS
  2. Implements cookie consent with OneTrust
  3. Includes social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  4. Has structured navigation with product and informational sections
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected in HTML
  6. Uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  7. Includes Google reCAPTCHA for form security
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates third-party services such as Google reCAPTCHA for security and Adobe Launch for tag management and analytics. The site loads external resources from reputable domains and uses a cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are adequately implemented through meta tags and structured navigation. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business scale, though some security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schlage.co.nz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schlage.co.nz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.