Skip to main content

Security report for scapabaltic.com

UAB Scapa Baltic · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Scapa Baltic is a Lithuanian-based manufacturer specializing in soft leather and fabric furniture with a strong Scandinavian design influence. The company emphasizes innovation, quality, and comfort, supported by over 50 years of industry experience and a large professional workforce. Their business model focuses on customized furniture production, employee development, and maintaining a transparent and stable corporate culture. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern plugins, offering rich content including employee stories and certifications. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and captcha-protected contact forms, though the use of an outdated WordPress version and missing security headers present some risks. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. The lack of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy in appearance but should address technical and compliance gaps to enhance security and credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scapabaltic.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scapa Baltic positions itself as a leading furniture manufacturer with a focus on Scandinavian quality and innovation. Their competitive advantage lies in extensive experience, a large skilled workforce, and a commitment to employee training and social responsibility. The company targets both end consumers seeking high-quality customizable furniture and potential employees. Revenue streams likely include direct furniture sales and possibly B2B partnerships. The website integrates with external platforms such as SharePoint and CVBankas for internal collaboration and recruitment. The presence of ISO certifications and detailed company information supports a strong market reputation. Strategic observations include the need to modernize technical infrastructure and improve privacy compliance to maintain competitive advantage and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and captcha protection on forms. However, the absence of key security headers and the use of an outdated WordPress version increase vulnerability risk. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance indicators are weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires improvements in patch management, header implementation, and privacy transparency to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and response readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Scapa Baltic
VAT number
LT116278917
Registration number
111627891
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Scapa Baltic
Description
Manufacturer of soft leather and fabric furniture with Scandinavian quality, innovative ideas, and focus on comfort. Over 50 years of experience with a large professional team and a commitment to transparency, stability, and safety.
Key services
Soft furniture manufacturing, Custom furniture design, Employee training and development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery 1.12.4, PHP
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Captcha on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Security certifications are prominently displayed with downloadable certificates.
  5. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which raises legitimacy concerns.
  7. Uses outdated WordPress version (4.9.26) which may pose security risks.
  8. Contact form includes captcha for spam protection.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook and job listing site CVBankas.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.26 with WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, using jQuery 1.12.4. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider elements. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility features are basic with no explicit ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and structured data (schema.org Blog type). Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS with no visible mixed content. Technical debt is indicated by outdated CMS and plugins, which should be addressed to reduce security risks and improve performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scapabaltic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scapabaltic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.