Skip to main content

Security report for scanfil.com

Scanfil · Manufacturing · Finland

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanfil is a well-established manufacturing partner specializing in industrial and B2B sectors, offering comprehensive services from electronics manufacturing to product development and supply chain management. The company targets global customers in industrial, energy, cleantech, and medtech sectors, positioning itself as a trusted and sustainable partner. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, leveraging WordPress CMS and Cloudflare for performance and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not found in the provided content. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the overall digital presence and content quality support legitimacy. Recommendations include publishing clear privacy and security policies and enhancing transparency on incident response and data protection roles.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 48 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

Keep watching scanfil.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scanfil operates in the manufacturing industry with a focus on contract manufacturing and product lifecycle services. Its business model revolves around providing end-to-end manufacturing solutions including electronics, mechanics, system integration, and outsourcing. The company maintains a strong market position with a global customer base in industrial and medtech sectors. The website highlights references and case studies, indicating a mature partnership ecosystem. Marketing and analytics tools are used moderately, with a focus on compliance. The absence of direct contact details on the main page suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly via dedicated portals. The company emphasizes sustainability and quality, which are key competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Cloudflare CDN and security services, and a comprehensive cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. Security headers are partially inferred but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the lack of explicit privacy policy and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and formalize security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive and easily accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency by naming a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to build user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scanfil
Description
Scanfil is a trusted manufacturing service partner. It serves Industrial, Energy & Cleantech and Medtech & Life Science customers globally.
Key services
Electronics Manufacturing, Mechanical Assembly, System Integration, Production Outsourcing, Product Development, Design for Excellence, Rapid Prototyping, Test Development, Distribution, Repair & Refurbish
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with categories
  • Use of Cloudflare for DDoS and WAF protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
BidTheatre
Tracking pixels
YouTube embedded video tracking
Marketing tools
BidTheatre
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Cookie consent banner is comprehensive and GDPR compliant
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in main content
  5. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter confirmed
  6. Use of modern CMS (WordPress) with SEO optimization
  7. Use of Cloudflare for CDN and security
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or registry issues
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, and Cloudflare services for CDN and security. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with video content embedded via Vimeo and external scripts for analytics and cookie management. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some security headers are not explicitly visible. The site uses a cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and third-party cookie disclosures, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence with room for minor improvements in security header implementation and policy publication.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scanfil.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scanfil.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.