Skip to main content

Security report for savemolives.com

Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety · Government · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety website serves as an authoritative platform for promoting traffic safety initiatives across Missouri. It is a government-affiliated coalition focused on reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries through public awareness campaigns, training programs, and data-driven strategies. The site is well-branded and targets Missouri residents, safety advocates, and government stakeholders. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 with modern libraries and is hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and trusted analytics integrations, though it lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust but does not overshadow the site's professional presentation and government affiliation. Overall, the site is a high-quality resource for roadway safety information in Missouri, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching savemolives.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The coalition operates as a medium-sized government-supported entity within the transportation and public safety sectors. It leverages partnerships with Missouri Department of Transportation and other local agencies to deliver safety campaigns such as Show-Me Zero, SMART, and CHEERS. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service and education. The website's extensive content, social media presence, and data dashboards indicate a mature digital presence aimed at community engagement and data transparency. The coalition's market position is strong within Missouri, serving as a trusted source for roadway safety information and resources.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive data. It uses reputable third-party analytics and tracking tools, including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, alongside The Trade Desk for advertising. However, the lack of security headers and absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file indicate areas for improvement. No incident response contacts or security policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is unusual and should be investigated to confirm domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with better transparency and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety
Description
The Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety is a partnership of safety advocates throughout Missouri aiming to end traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roadways. They implement Missouri’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan called Show-Me Zero, focusing on effective strategies to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes.
Key services
Public safety awareness campaigns, Safety training programs (e.g., SMART, CHEERS), Data dashboards and crash statistics, Event information and outreach, Safety materials ordering
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10 CMS, jQuery, Bootstrap 4.6.2, Font Awesome 6, Slick Carousel, Colorbox, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URLs and Google Tag Manager usage)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of external trusted analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
The Trade Desk (adsrvr.org)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-affiliated coalition site focused on roadway safety in Missouri.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the main page.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  5. Multiple official social media channels linked and active.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Drupal 10 CMS with a robust tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Slick Carousel for UI components. Hosting on AWS Cloudfront CDN supports good performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with proper ARIA landmarks and skip links. SEO is supported by canonical links and meta tags. Analytics and marketing tools are integrated effectively but should be monitored for privacy impact. The site could benefit from performance optimizations such as reducing third-party script load and implementing security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and supports the coalition's mission effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with savemolives.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review savemolives.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.