Skip to main content

Security report for savaria.com

Savaria Corporation · Manufacturing · Canada

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Savaria Corporation is a global leader specializing in accessibility and mobility solutions, including home elevators, stair lifts, wheelchair lifts, and commercial accessibility products. The company targets consumers requiring mobility assistance, as well as architects, builders, and dealers. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and distributing high-quality accessibility products supported by a dealer network and professional services. The website reflects a strong market position with comprehensive product offerings and professional branding. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and CookieYes for consent management. The site is hosted likely behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search visibility. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent with detailed categories, including security cookies like XSRF-TOKEN and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA. However, security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no public security policy or incident response information. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from trust given the professional site presentation. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Recommendations include adding security headers, publishing a security policy, and maintaining up-to-date third-party scripts to enhance security and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching savaria.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Savaria operates in the manufacturing sector focused on accessibility and mobility products. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad product portfolio and a global dealer network. Revenue streams likely include product sales, service contracts, and dealer partnerships. The target customer segments include individuals with mobility challenges, commercial clients requiring accessibility solutions, and professionals such as architects and builders. Growth indicators include new product launches and educational resources for professionals. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with dealers and suppliers. Strategic observations highlight a focus on innovation, customer support, and compliance with accessibility standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent management, and bot protection mechanisms. The presence of security-related cookies and detailed cookie categories indicates attention to privacy and security compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers and public incident response information suggests areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance with GDPR is supported by the privacy policy and consent mechanisms. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing certifications or compliance badges related to security and accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Savaria Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Savaria Corporation
Description
Savaria is a global leader in accessibility and mobility products including home elevators, stair lifts, wheelchair lifts, and commercial accessibility solutions.
Key services
Home Elevators, Wheelchair Lifts, Commercial Elevators, Stairlifts, Patient Handling Products, Automotive Accessibility, Commercial and Home Accessibility
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.1.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, CookieYes Consent Management, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Cloudflare (inferred from cookies)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • Use of security cookies like XSRF-TOKEN
  • Bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Simpli.fi
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Ads, TapAd, Unruly Media, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  3. Multiple contact methods clearly provided
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  6. No evidence of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or query limitations
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and robust technical infrastructure using jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and CookieYes for consent management. It is hosted likely behind Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The CMS identified is WebPal, which supports content management and digital asset delivery. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including structured data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and script management. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require regular maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with savaria.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review savaria.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.