Skip to main content

Security report for savagis.org

The International Sava River Basin Commission · Government · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The International Sava River Basin Commission operates the Sava GIS Geoportal, a specialized platform providing geospatial data and tools for river basin management and navigation safety in the Sava River Basin region. The portal offers access to real-time and historical hydrological data, waterway marking, navigation safety inspection information, and a metadata catalogue, targeting government agencies, environmental professionals, and stakeholders. Technically, the site employs established JavaScript frameworks such as Ext JS and OpenLayers, integrates Google Maps API, and uses Google Analytics for user tracking. The domain is registered since 2015 with transparent WHOIS data, consistent with the organization's profile. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves a niche governmental/non-profit audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching savagis.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Sava GIS Geoportal is positioned as a niche governmental/non-profit service provider focused on environmental and transportation sectors related to river basin management. Its competitive advantage lies in providing integrated GIS data and real-time hydrological information for the Sava River Basin, supported by EU co-funding. The business model is service-oriented, offering public access to critical environmental data and navigation safety tools. The portal's partnership ecosystem includes related domain services for hydrological data and navigation safety, enhancing its value proposition. Growth indicators are moderate, aligned with governmental project timelines and funding. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance privacy compliance and security posture to meet evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection in place. However, it lacks implementation of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies was found, indicating potential gaps in security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests incomplete GDPR compliance. While no explicit vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to improve its security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security governance.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to broaden user reach and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The International Sava River Basin Commission
Description
The website serves as a geoportal for the Sava River Basin Commission, providing geographic information system (GIS) data and tools related to river basin management, navigation safety, waterway marking, and historical and real-time data for the Sava River Basin region.
Key services
GIS mapping and data visualization, Real-time and historical hydrological data (SAVA HIS), Waterway marking information, Navigation safety inspection data, Metadata catalogue
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, OpenLayers 2.13.1, Ext JS 4.2.1, Google Maps API, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Ext JS, OpenLayers
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a specialized geoportal for the Sava River Basin Commission.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the analyzed page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  4. Uses modern JavaScript frameworks and mapping libraries.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. Domain registration is transparent and appropriate.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature technology stack including Ext JS 4.2.1 and OpenLayers 2.13.1 for GIS functionalities, supplemented by Google Maps API for mapping services. The integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate digital maturity in user tracking and marketing. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. The site lacks a modern CMS, suggesting a custom or legacy platform. Technical risks include outdated JavaScript libraries and missing security headers, which could impact long-term maintainability and security. Modernization opportunities include upgrading frameworks, enhancing SEO, and adopting responsive design standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with savagis.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review savagis.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.