Skip to main content

Security report for saunaholz.eu

SIA "Ošukalns" · Manufacturing · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

54/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Ošukalns" is a Latvian medium-sized manufacturing company specializing in wood processing, including production of sauna profiles, pallet timber, and glued materials. Founded in 1993, it has established a strong market position with international customers across Europe, the USA, and Asia. The company emphasizes quality control throughout the production cycle and holds FSC certification, enhancing its credibility in sustainable forestry products. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear contact information and product offerings. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, supported by a proprietary CMS (K-Panelis). Mobile optimization and SEO are adequately addressed, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and business-focused, with room for enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saunaholz.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
54

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in manufacturing and related sectors such as construction, forestry, and energy. Its business model centers on full-cycle wood product manufacturing and export. The presence of FSC certification and a diverse product portfolio including sauna accessories and wooden briquettes indicates a broad market appeal. The website links to partner domains such as www.owood.lv, suggesting a partnership ecosystem. The company targets B2B customers requiring high-quality wood materials. The website content and structure support a professional image, aiding in customer trust and market competitiveness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel introduces moderate tracking but no obvious security risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a medium-sized manufacturing business but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Expand privacy compliance documentation with detailed cookie policies and data retention statements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Ošukalns"
VAT number
LV45403003353
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Ošukalns"
Description
SIA „OŠUKALNS” founded in 1993, started as a small forestry firm and now performs full production cycle in wood processing including standard sauna profiles, pallet materials, finger-jointed and glued panels and beams.
Key services
Wood processing, Production of sauna profiles, Pallet timber, Finger-jointed and glued materials, Wooden briquettes, Sauna accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Flexslider, FancyBox, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
K-Panelis 3.1.5 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Facebook Pixel domain)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and consistent across pages.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  6. Use of multiple third-party JavaScript libraries and Facebook Pixel for tracking.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. FSC certification prominently displayed as a trust indicator.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS (K-Panelis 3.1.5) and uses a combination of Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, and other JavaScript libraries for UI and interactivity. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The presence of multiple CSS and JS files suggests some technical debt but overall a stable infrastructure. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, indicating integration with social media marketing tools. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saunaholz.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saunaholz.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.