The website www.saulespulkstenis.lv is a niche cultural and educational platform dedicated to sundials in Latvia. It provides information about sundial culture, exhibitions, maps of sundials across Latvia, and contact options for sundial owners or interested parties. The site appears to be small-scale and community-focused without commercial intent. Technically, it is built on WordPress 6.7.2, uses standard web technologies, and is accessible with HTTPS enabled. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO basics but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response contact information. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy for general audiences, and free from adult or explicit content.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention saulespulkstenis.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for saulespulkstenis.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The business model is informational and cultural promotion, targeting enthusiasts, educational institutions, and local communities interested in sundials. The website holds a niche market position in Latvia with no evident commercial activities or partnerships. The absence of contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links limits direct engagement and business credibility. The site’s content quality and branding are consistent and relevant to its audience. Growth potential may be limited due to the specialized focus and lack of broader marketing or monetization strategies.
Security posture
The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit insights into user behavior. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security best practices and compliance measures.
Recommendations
Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
Add clear contact information for security incidents and abuse reporting to improve incident response readiness.
Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Enhance business credibility by providing verified contact details, social media links, and possibly certifications or trust badges.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
Website focused on sundials (saules pulksteņi) culture, information, exhibitions, and locations in Latvia. It provides resources about sundials, exhibitions like “Saules laiks”, and contact options for sundial owners or interested parties.
Key services
Information about sundials, Exhibition details, Map of sundials in Latvia, Contact and support for sundial owners
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
No visible exposed sensitive data
No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is niche and culturally focused on sundials in Latvia.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the content.
No social media links or external business partner domains detected.
Uses WordPress CMS with standard themes and scripts.
HTTPS is enabled with no visible SSL issues.
No security headers detected in the provided data.
No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with standard themes and scripts. It uses modern web standards including responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no obvious broken elements. The site lacks advanced technical SEO metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No external analytics or marketing tools are integrated, which simplifies privacy but limits marketing insights. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site could benefit from technical modernization including enhanced SEO metadata, security headers, and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with saulespulkstenis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saulespulkstenis.lv.