Skip to main content

Security report for saugierdve.lt

GRIFS AG · Other · Lithuania

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at saugierdve.lt/login serves as a login portal for GRIFS AG, a company presumably operating in Lithuania given the domain and registrar information. The site is primarily functional with a focus on user authentication, featuring branding elements but lacking detailed business descriptions or public-facing content. The technical infrastructure includes standard web technologies such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, Google Fonts for typography, and Font Awesome for icons. The domain is registered with a Lithuanian registrar, UAB "Interneto vizija", since 2016, indicating a stable and legitimate presence. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service on the login page, which raises compliance concerns, especially regarding GDPR. No contact information or incident response channels are exposed, limiting user support and security communication. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, allowing full content access. Overall, the website demonstrates a basic level of technical implementation suitable for a corporate login portal but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures. The absence of contact and policy information may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the site's security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saugierdve.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GRIFS AG appears to be a corporate entity with a digital presence focused on secure user access. The domain age and registrar data support a legitimate business operation in Lithuania. The lack of detailed public content suggests the site is primarily for internal or client use rather than marketing. The use of Google Analytics indicates an interest in user behavior tracking, possibly for service improvement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The business model and market positioning remain unclear due to limited public information.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The site collects user data via login forms but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, potentially violating GDPR requirements. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, which may expose the site to direct attacks. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the website to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response communication channel.
  4. Consider deploying a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update tracking and analytics configurations to align with privacy best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GRIFS AG
Description
No explicit business description found in the provided content. The website appears to be related to GRIFS AG, likely a company with a login portal.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for GRIFS AG.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or security policies are exposed on the login page.
  4. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  5. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is registered with a Lithuanian registrar.
  7. Website content is limited to login functionality with branding.
  8. No explicit business description or detailed company info on the page.
  9. No visible social media or external business links.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome. The HTML structure is standard with responsive design elements indicated by viewport meta tags and CSS files. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic but present. Hosting details are limited but the registrar is a Lithuanian company. No CMS or specific frameworks are detected. The site could improve by adding more semantic HTML and accessibility features, as well as optimizing security headers and privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saugierdve.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saugierdve.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.