Skip to main content

Security report for sauevald.ee

Other · N/a

High risk. 20 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website sauevald.ee is currently inaccessible beyond a Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge page. This indicates that the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) which blocks automated access and requires human verification before allowing entry. Due to this blocking, no actual business content, contact information, or policies are accessible for analysis. The site appears to be secured by Cloudflare services including their challenge platform and analytics beacon. Without access to the underlying content, it is not possible to assess the business model, services, or compliance posture in detail. The security posture is partially indicated by the use of Cloudflare's WAF and Turnstile, which is a positive security control, but no further security headers or configurations are visible. Overall, the site is protected but the lack of accessible content limits the ability to provide a comprehensive security or business analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

20 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sauevald.ee

This scan found 35 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
0
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sauevald.ee, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
50%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sauevald.ee.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the content being blocked by a Cloudflare security challenge, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the site. The domain name suggests it may be related to a municipality or local government entity in Estonia, but no explicit business information, market positioning, or services are visible. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS data aligns with typical practices for government or public sector domains. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the accessible data.

Security posture

The site employs Cloudflare's Turnstile CAPTCHA and challenge platform, indicating a proactive approach to mitigating automated attacks and bots. However, no additional security headers or policies are visible in the provided content. The SSL/TLS configuration cannot be assessed from the HTML content alone. No forms or input fields are exposed except for the hidden Turnstile response token, reducing attack surface. The lack of visible privacy or cookie policies is a compliance gap. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present. Overall, the security posture is moderate but cannot be fully evaluated due to content blocking.

Recommendations

  1. Provide accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Ensure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are properly configured and visible.
  3. Publish clear contact information and incident response channels for transparency.
  4. Consider providing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Improve website accessibility by allowing at least minimal content access before challenge or providing alternative verification methods.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha verifying human visitor before access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare Challenge Platform, Cloudflare Insights Beacon

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge.
  2. No actual business or contact content is accessible on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found or accessible.
  4. No contact information, emails, phone numbers, or social media links found.
  5. Page is minimal and only serves as a security gate to the actual site.
  6. Technical stack heavily reliant on Cloudflare security and analytics services.
  7. No visible security headers or SSL configuration details available from content.
  8. No forms or data collection fields visible except hidden Turnstile response input.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata present.
  10. No logos or branding images found in the accessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies heavily on Cloudflare's security infrastructure including the Turnstile CAPTCHA and challenge platform, which is effective for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a gatekeeper page. No CMS or backend technologies are detectable from the content. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site uses modern web fonts and responsive CSS styles but no actual page content is delivered until verification is passed. The hosting provider is Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security services. Technical debt or modernization needs cannot be evaluated due to limited access.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sauevald.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sauevald.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.