Skip to main content

Security report for satadiag.fi

Satakunnan hyvinvointialue · Government · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Satakunnan hyvinvointialue is a Finnish regional welfare area organization established in 2021, dedicated to promoting the wellbeing, safety, and health of residents in the Satakunta region. The website serves as an official portal providing comprehensive information about social and health services, digital service access, customer support, and current news relevant to the community. The organization operates as a public sector entity with a clear focus on healthcare and social welfare services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as React Aria for accessibility, Matomo for analytics, and chat widgets for user engagement. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms implemented, though some security headers could be improved. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the organization's identity, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with GDPR regulations, serving its public sector mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching satadiag.fi

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong regional government position in Finland's healthcare and social services sector. Its business model is public service delivery funded by government allocations, targeting residents and service users in Satakunta. The website supports digital transformation efforts with online appointment booking and digital service portals. Partnerships with related service providers and digital platforms are evident, enhancing service accessibility. The site content and structure reflect a mature digital presence suitable for a large public entity. Growth indicators include active news updates and community engagement features. The organization maintains a consistent brand and trust signals appropriate for government services.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable scripts were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. Third-party integrations such as Matomo analytics and chat widgets are reputable but require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency for security governance. Overall, the security maturity is good for a public sector website but could benefit from enhanced header policies and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance contact information by adding verified company emails and phone numbers for better user support.
  5. Continue improving accessibility and mobile optimization to maintain high user experience standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Satakunnan hyvinvointialue
Registration number
3221304-3
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Satakunnan hyvinvointialue
Description
Satakunnan hyvinvointialue is a regional welfare area organization in Finland focused on promoting wellbeing, safety, and health of the Satakunta region residents across all levels.
Key services
Health services, Social services, Emergency services, Digital service access, Customer service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, React Aria, Matomo Analytics, Ninchat, Rechanneld Widget, CSS Variables Ponyfill
Frameworks
React (partial usage), WordPress theme and plugins
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with consent state propagation
  • No exposed emails or sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable analytics and chat services

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics, Ninchat Chat Widget, Rechanneld Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to public welfare services.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  4. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms in place.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected in HTML.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the organization.
  7. No suspicious external domains or links found.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with custom theming and modern JavaScript libraries such as React Aria for accessibility enhancements. Analytics are handled via Matomo, providing privacy-focused tracking. The site uses external chat and widget services (Ninchat, Rechanneld) to improve user engagement. Performance is moderate with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain uses Finnish nameservers. The site uses CSS variables with ponyfill for compatibility and includes fallback scripts for older browsers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a large public sector organization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with satadiag.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review satadiag.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.