Skip to main content

Security report for sapphirebet.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SapphireBet operates as an online sports betting and casino platform offering a variety of gambling services including live betting, slots, jackpots, esports, and fast games. The platform targets adult gamblers internationally, providing multiple language options and a range of promotions and bonuses to attract users. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and uses CDN services for content delivery, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sapphirebet.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sapphirebet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,261
Employees
0
Customers
2,261
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sapphirebet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a medium-sized online gambling operator founded in 2018, focusing on sports betting and casino games. Its business model revolves around attracting bettors through bonuses, cashback offers, and a wide selection of games. The platform supports multiple languages, indicating a strategy to capture diverse markets. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The lack of visible contact information and compliance documentation may impact trust and regulatory adherence. The company appears to rely on third-party content delivery and gaming providers. Growth potential exists but requires strengthening compliance and security transparency to compete effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and domain transfer lock in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or incident response policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file reduces the ability for coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is insufficient, lacking GDPR indicators and cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response contact channels are not provided, which could delay handling of security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve browser security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments of third-party scripts and integrations.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
2025-00158
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Trusted bookmaker's platform offering legal gambling & exclusive games. Join to enjoy live betting, bonuses, cashback offers, spread bets, tips, and win with favorite providers in slots, casino, & sports
Key services
Sports betting, Live betting, Casino games, Slots, Jackpot games, Bonuses and promotions, Esports betting, Fast games, Virtual sports, Poker
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Webpack, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a fully functional online gambling and betting platform.
  2. Multiple languages supported indicating international targeting.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No explicit contact information or security policies found on the main page.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and CDN for content delivery.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  7. No social media or direct contact emails/phones found in the provided content.
  8. Security headers and policies could be improved.
  9. Content is adult-oriented due to gambling but no explicit adult content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack primarily based on Vue.js and JavaScript, served via a CDN for performance optimization. The HTML structure is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). Multiple language versions are supported, enhancing international reach. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting and domain registration are handled by NameCheap, Inc. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and preloading of stylesheets. The site lacks visible analytics or tracking scripts in the provided content, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sapphirebet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sapphirebet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.