Skip to main content

Security report for sandrinenugue.com

Sandrine Nugue Studio · Other · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sandrine Nugue Studio is a small independent design studio specializing in type design, lettering, and graphic design services. The website serves primarily as a portfolio showcasing various projects including publications, signage, pictograms, and performance scores. The target audience includes design professionals, artists, and clients interested in typography and graphic design. The business model is focused on creative services and portfolio presentation, with a market position as a niche player in the typography and graphic design space. Technically, the website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, hosted by OVH sas. It features responsive images and a clean, well-structured design optimized for mobile devices. However, it lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms and does not use analytics or marketing tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which reduces its security posture. There are no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The WHOIS data shows a consistent and legitimate domain registration with no privacy protection, appropriate for the business type. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but has gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the site's credibility and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sandrinenugue.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sandrine Nugue Studio operates in the creative design sector with a focus on typography and graphic design. The studio's competitive advantage lies in its specialized expertise in type design and lettering, supported by a portfolio of diverse projects including publications and signage. The business model is service-oriented, targeting clients in the arts and publishing industries. The website reflects a small-scale operation with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of marketing or analytics tools. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. Overall, the studio maintains a niche presence with a clear brand identity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No forms or data collection mechanisms reduce the risk of input-based vulnerabilities. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting the ability to manage security incidents effectively. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small portfolio site but requires enhancements to meet modern security standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve the website's security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sandrine Nugue Studio
Description
Type & Graphic Design
Key services
Type design, Lettering, Graphic design, Publication design, Signage and pictogram design, Score and performance design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain uses HTTPS

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a portfolio site for a small independent design studio specializing in typography and graphic design.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information limited to a single email address; no phone or physical address provided.
  4. No forms detected on the site; minimal data collection.
  5. No social media links or external marketing/analytics tools detected.
  6. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC.
  7. Content is well structured with good navigation and responsive images.
  8. No advertising or tracking technologies present.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript) without reliance on major frameworks or CMS platforms. It is hosted by OVH sas, a reputable hosting provider. The site uses responsive images and meta tags for SEO optimization. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. However, the lack of advanced frameworks or analytics tools indicates a simple technical infrastructure. There is an opportunity to modernize the stack by integrating accessibility improvements and security best practices. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical risks that could impact business operations if exploited.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sandrinenugue.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sandrinenugue.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.