Skip to main content

Security report for sanantoniofc.com

San Antonio FC · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

San Antonio FC operates as a professional soccer club with a strong digital presence focused on providing fans and stakeholders with team information, schedules, and engagement opportunities. The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform enhanced with React components and integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, advertising, and consent management. The site demonstrates good technical maturity with HTTPS enforcement, privacy compliance mechanisms, and social media integration. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, though the website content and external references support its legitimacy. Security posture is solid with encrypted connections and cookie consent, but could be improved with additional security headers and explicit incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy standards, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sanantoniofc.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

San Antonio FC is positioned as a key player in the USL Championship soccer league, targeting soccer fans and local communities. The business model revolves around sports entertainment, fan engagement, and related media content. The club leverages partnerships with USL corporate entities and leagues, enhancing its market reach and credibility. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, merchandise, sponsorships, and digital content. The website's integration with league sites and social media channels indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active social media presence and expansion of digital services. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance direct contact channels and security transparency to further build trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. The use of Osano for consent management and Google Analytics for tracking indicates awareness of privacy and data protection. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts on the site are gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain trust but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the site is secure for general user interaction but would benefit from enhanced security documentation and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden site security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Establish clear domain registration transparency or privacy justification to improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
San Antonio FC
Description
San Antonio FC is a professional soccer club with a focus on soccer-related content and team information.
Key services
Soccer team information, Match schedules, Ticket sales, Fan engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Osano Consent Management, SportsEngine, Ecal Widget
Frameworks
React, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Privacy policy linked

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Sitescout
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional sports club site with comprehensive team and league information.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and consent management for privacy compliance.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage content.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked to USL corporate site.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information on site.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Website is well-structured with good SEO and accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with React for dynamic components, integrating Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome icons, and Osano for cookie consent management. It uses external widgets such as Ecal for event management and SportsEngine for sports-related content. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from both internal and external sources, indicating a complex but modern tech stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but present. The site lacks some advanced security headers and detailed technical documentation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional sports website with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sanantoniofc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sanantoniofc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.