Skip to main content

Security report for saldva.lt

SALDVA · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SALDVA is a Lithuanian spice manufacturing and retail company established in 1994, recognized for its high-quality natural spices and blends. The company targets both consumers and businesses in the food industry, offering a broad product range and private label manufacturing services. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand presence and a focus on product quality and customer experience. Technically, the site is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure, and optimized for mobile devices with good performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, although additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with a privacy policy and cookie banner. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, with room for improvement in contact transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saldva.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SALDVA holds a strong position in the Lithuanian spice manufacturing sector, leveraging decades of experience since 1994. Its business model combines manufacturing with retail and private label services, targeting both end consumers and food industry clients. The company benefits from a reputable brand and a broad product portfolio, supporting growth and market penetration. The website supports e-commerce and customer engagement through search and product discovery features. Marketing efforts include Facebook and Google tracking, and live chat support, indicating active customer interaction. The absence of detailed contact information and terms of service suggests potential areas for operational transparency enhancement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates opportunities to strengthen defenses against common web threats. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could impact responsiveness to security incidents. Tracking technologies are used moderately, with Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager, necessitating clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a medium-sized e-commerce site but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to build trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update privacy compliance documentation to align with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SALDVA
Description
SALDVA is a Lithuanian company specializing in the production and sale of spices and spice blends since 1994. It is one of the oldest spice processing companies in Lithuania, known for high product quality and natural ingredients. Their products are valued domestically and internationally.
Key services
Spice production, Retail sales, Private label manufacturing, Food industry supply
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Firebase, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Privacy policy present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent mechanism.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. Website uses modern React/Next.js technology stack with Google Cloud hosting for assets.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly visible; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. Tracking includes Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager; live chat via Tawk.to is integrated.
  9. Business information is consistent with a Lithuanian spice manufacturer established in 1994.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Next.js frameworks, leveraging server-side rendering and modern JavaScript technologies. Assets are hosted on Google Cloud Storage, ensuring reliable delivery. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates third-party services such as Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Tawk.to for analytics and customer support. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but could be improved with structured data and enhanced accessibility compliance. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and scalable but could benefit from performance tuning and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saldva.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saldva.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.