Skip to main content

Security report for salansky.studio

SALANSKY & CO., s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Salansky is a small creative studio based in the Czech Republic specializing in artistic glass design, bespoke lighting, and exclusive tableware collections. The company positions itself as a niche luxury brand targeting design enthusiasts and clients seeking unique, handcrafted glass creations. The website reflects a professional and artistic brand image with a focus on visual storytelling and product showcases. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap and Fancyapps UI, with Google Analytics and Google Ads for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and does not provide visible privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, though the domain is newly registered in 2024, which aligns with a new or rebranded business. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching salansky.studio

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the creative design sector with a focus on glass art and lighting installations. Its business model includes direct sales through an online store and bespoke commissions. The presence of a physical showroom and company registration details adds credibility. The company leverages social media platforms extensively for marketing and brand awareness. The partnership with Stroystudio.com suggests collaboration in digital or creative services. The niche market focus and artistic approach provide competitive advantages in luxury and bespoke design segments. Growth potential exists through expanding bespoke offerings and enhancing digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain status flags prevent unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics and Ads are present, but no explicit consent mechanism is implemented. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Consider adding visible contact phone numbers and expanding contact options to improve business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SALANSKY & CO., s.r.o.
Registration number
C 47856/KSUL
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SALANSKY & CO., s.r.o.
Description
Salansky is a creative studio specializing in glass design and unique glass creations, offering tailored solutions, imaginative art installations, innovative lighting designs, exclusive tableware collections, and bespoke projects.
Key services
Tailored glass solutions, Art installations, Lighting design and series, Tableware collections and limited editions, Bespoke design projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.3, Fancyapps UI 4.0, Flow Gallery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js), Google Ads (AW-10878886208)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with a clear focus on artistic glass and lighting products.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No visible contact phone numbers; only email and physical address provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and Google analytics/tracking scripts.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is new but properly registered without privacy protection.
  7. Social media presence is strong with links to Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Pinterest.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or contact page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap 5.1.3 for responsive design, Fancyapps UI for UI components, and Flow Gallery for image galleries. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads external scripts asynchronously for Google Analytics and Google Ads tracking. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS servers are managed by Forpsi. Performance is moderate with optimized images in WebP format and responsive design for mobile devices. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and lack of security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with salansky.studio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review salansky.studio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.