Security report for sagscoburg.de
Stadt Coburg · Government · Germany
Stadt Coburg operates the 'Sag's Coburg' platform, a municipal government website designed to facilitate communication between residents and city authorities by enabling citizens to report issues, provide suggestions, and offer compliments related to public spaces and services. The platform supports civic engagement and aims to improve the quality of life in Coburg through timely feedback and municipal responsiveness. The website is well-branded with official city logos and social media presence, targeting local residents and visitors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS using the Enfold theme and Avia framework, hosted on RZone servers. It employs Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and features good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. No forms are embedded on the analyzed page; reporting is redirected to an external city domain. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners but lacks visible security headers in the HTML content. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is limited but consistent with a legitimate municipal domain. Privacy policies and terms of service are present and comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy, professional, and functional government service platform with moderate technical sophistication and good privacy practices. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency could enhance its security posture further.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- Critical
Unable to retrieve SSL certificate
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
- Critical
Network security
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
- High
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
- NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
- NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching sagscoburg.de
This scan found 13 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 0
- Email security
- 65
- DNS health
- 70
- Network security
- 20
- Average
- 39
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
- Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
- Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
- Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
- Consider integrating direct reporting forms on the platform with secure input validation to streamline user submissions.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Stadt Coburg
- Description
- Stadt Coburg provides a platform for citizens to report issues, suggestions, and compliments related to public spaces and services in Coburg. The site aims to facilitate communication between residents and municipal authorities to improve the city environment.
- Key services
- Public issue reporting, Citizen feedback collection, Information dissemination about city services
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Matomo Analytics, Enfold Theme, Podlove Podcasting Plugin
- Frameworks
- Avia Framework
- Platforms
- WordPress CMS
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 80/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Matomo
- Tracking level
- minimal
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- Matomo
- Transparency
- basic
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is a municipal government platform for citizen reporting and feedback.
- Content is in German and well structured for target audience.
- No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on this page.
- Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and linked.
- Uses Matomo analytics for privacy-friendly tracking.
- No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
- No forms present on this page; reporting is done via external link to https://www.coburg.de/sc.
- Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram with official city accounts.
- Website uses WordPress CMS with Enfold theme and Avia framework.
- No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with sagscoburg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sagscoburg.de.