Skip to main content

Security report for safinnes.lv

SIA SAFIN NES · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAFIN NES is a Latvian company specializing in the sale and distribution of high-quality steel and metal products, targeting both large and small businesses across Latvia and Europe. Their business model centers on an e-commerce platform offering a wide range of metal materials with flexible payment and delivery options. The company emphasizes professional service, competitive pricing, and customized client solutions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Laravel Livewire, Bootstrap, and Google Tag Manager, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses CSRF tokens, and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though it lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and business information appear consistent and trustworthy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for security and compliance enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching safinnes.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SAFIN NES holds a strong market position in the Baltic region as a supplier of steel products with one of the broadest assortments available. Their competitive advantages include flexible payment methods, fast delivery across Latvia and Europe, and a professional team with over 20 years of industry experience. The business model leverages an e-commerce platform to expand sales channels and improve customer convenience. Partnerships with recognized brands and support from the European Union Recovery Fund enhance credibility and growth potential. The company targets B2B and B2C segments requiring metal materials, with a focus on quality and service. Growth indicators include digital transformation efforts and a well-structured online presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS, CSRF protection, and a user-consent based cookie policy aligned with GDPR. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts, which are important for transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern frameworks and secure session management is positive, but the absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file indicates room for improvement in security culture and incident handling preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA „SAFIN NES”
VAT number
LV40003896966
Registration number
40003896966
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA SAFIN NES
Description
Mēs specializējamies kvalitatīvu tērauda produktu tirdzniecībā nodrošinot dažādus metāla materiālus par labākajām cenām. Augstākās kvalitātes tērauds no pasaulē vadošajiem ražotājiem lieliem un maziem uzņēmumiem.
Key services
Metāla produktu tirdzniecība, Materiālu piegāde Latvijā un Eiropā, Materiālu uzglabāšana un sagarināšana, E-komercijas platforma
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Livewire (Laravel)
Frameworks
Laravel (inferred from Livewire usage)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Cookie consent with configurable categories
  • Secure session cookies (inferred)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with user customization.
  3. Clear business contact information including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks with good mobile optimization.
  7. Presence of Google Tag Manager indicates tracking and analytics usage.
  8. No signs of WAF or security blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Laravel Livewire, Bootstrap for responsive design, and Font Awesome for icons. It uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads external CSS and JS resources efficiently and adapts background images for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site lacks a detected CMS but is likely custom-built on Laravel. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. Technical debt appears low, but adding advanced security headers and improving accessibility would strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with safinnes.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review safinnes.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.