Skip to main content

Security report for safewaygangway.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website safewaygangway.com appears to represent a small business established in 2018, likely operating in a niche sector not explicitly detailed in the available content. The site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and is hosted with DNS services provided by Cloudflare. The technical infrastructure is moderately modern but lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers. The site uses Google Site Kit, indicating integration with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. However, the website lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, terms of service, and explicit contact information, which impacts its trustworthiness and regulatory compliance. The content quality is minimal, with mostly technical CSS and style data visible, suggesting either incomplete content or a heavily styled but content-light site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching safewaygangway.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind safewaygangway.com does not publicly disclose detailed company information, certifications, or contact details on the website. The domain age is consistent with a small business lifecycle, and the use of WordPress and Divi theme suggests a cost-effective digital presence. The absence of privacy and security policies, as well as contact information, limits the ability to assess market positioning or customer engagement strategies. The site likely targets a general audience but does not provide clear business model insights or sector classification. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the available data.

Security posture

Security posture is basic with HTTPS assumed but no explicit security headers detected. The domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized transfers. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a missed opportunity for DNS security enhancement. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present on the site. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is poor due to missing policies. Overall, the site has a low security maturity level and would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance site security.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress 6.8.3
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Site Kit by Google)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Site Kit by Google
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi child theme.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No explicit contact information or security policies present.
  4. Site uses Google Site Kit plugin indicating Google Analytics usage.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. Domain is registered since 2018 and is not privacy protected.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Content is minimal and mostly technical CSS and style data; no substantive business content extracted from provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a Safewaygangway child theme version 1.0.0 and uses the Divi theme framework. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, which provides some level of protection and performance optimization. The site includes Google Site Kit plugin integration, indicating use of Google Analytics for traffic analysis. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site lacks advanced SEO optimization and comprehensive metadata beyond basic viewport and charset declarations. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but requires improvements in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with safewaygangway.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review safewaygangway.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.