Skip to main content

Security report for safetystorage.ie

Safety Storage Systems Ltd. · Manufacturing · Ireland

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Safety Storage Systems Ltd. is a medium-sized manufacturing company based in Ireland specializing in high-quality chemical storage solutions. With over 20 years of expertise, the company offers a broad range of products including chemical stores, cabinets, spill control equipment, and custom safety shelters. Their market position is that of a trusted specialist with certifications such as ISO, CE, DIBT, and FM, reinforcing their commitment to quality and safety. The website targets businesses and organizations requiring safe chemical storage and related safety infrastructure. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript frameworks and SEO optimizations, providing a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Privacy compliance is supported by clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the company's business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching safetystorage.ie

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
43
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on chemical storage and safety products. Their business model revolves around manufacturing, custom solutions, and direct sales to industrial clients. The presence of certifications and accreditations provides competitive advantages in regulated markets. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and social media engagement on LinkedIn and YouTube. Growth indicators include recent news updates and product additions. The partnership with Maverick International for website development indicates a professional digital ecosystem. No suspicious or unrelated domains are linked, supporting a focused business operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. The use of a cookie consent management system indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of explicit security or incident response policies limit the security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, which could improve transparency and trust. The site does not show signs of malware or phishing. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance and user inclusivity.
  5. Optimize website performance further to improve load times and user experience, especially on mobile devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Safety Storage Systems Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Safety Storage Systems Ltd.
Description
The most durable, reliable, highest-quality chemical storage units, backed by 20 years of specialist expertise and a total commitment to service.
Key services
Chemical Stores, Chemical Cabinets, Spill Trays and Spill Control, Shelters and Site Safety, Custom Solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, YouTube Player API
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, CookieFirst consent management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive regarding product offerings and company background.
  3. Clear contact information with phone, email, and physical address provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No visible security issues or WAF blocking detected.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  7. Certifications and accreditations prominently displayed.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) for UI components. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site uses external scripts for cookie consent and YouTube video embedding. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in load speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, but the absence of some security headers and incident response mechanisms indicates areas for technical enhancement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with safetystorage.ie. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review safetystorage.ie.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.