Skip to main content

Security report for safetica.com

Safetica Technologies Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Safetica Technologies Inc. operates a professional website focused on intelligent data security solutions including data loss prevention, insider risk management, cloud security, and compliance. The company targets security leaders such as CISOs, CIOs, and IT professionals in medium to large enterprises globally. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, demonstrating a mature digital presence with multiple language options and industry-recognized certifications. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, analytics tools, and security best practices including HTTPS and security headers, ensuring a secure and performant user experience. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and lack of explicit contact or incident response information slightly reduce transparency and trust. Overall, the site presents a strong security posture with room for improvement in privacy disclosures and direct contact availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching safetica.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Safetica holds a solid market position as a trusted provider of AI-powered data security solutions, serving over 120 countries. Their business model is B2B SaaS with a focus on compliance and insider threat mitigation. The company leverages partnerships and a partner portal ecosystem to expand reach. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, subscriptions, and professional services. The website's multilingual support and industry-specific solutions indicate a strategic approach to diverse verticals including automotive, healthcare, finance, and government. The presence of multiple awards and customer testimonials enhances credibility and market differentiation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of reputable analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy controls such as Google Consent Mode. However, the lack of a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and absence of incident response contact details represent gaps in transparency and readiness. The site’s security practices align well with industry standards but could benefit from enhanced communication of security policies to users and partners.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  2. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Enhance visibility of contact information including support and sales phone numbers and emails.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize potential security risks.
  5. Consider WHOIS privacy transparency improvements or provide verified registrant information to increase trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Safetica Technologies Inc.
Description
Safetica protects businesses against insider threats, offers data loss protection, and supports regulatory compliance.
Key services
Data Protection, Insider Risk Management, Compliance & Discovery, Cloud Security
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Leaflet, Owl Carousel, Smartlook, Navattic
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure external scripts loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Smartlook, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Capterra
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Navattic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused on data loss prevention and insider risk management.
  3. Multiple language versions available indicating international presence.
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  6. Multiple industry awards and certifications displayed.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter (X), and YouTube.
  8. No explicit privacy or security policy pages linked in footer but legal page likely contains them.
  9. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts.
  10. WHOIS data missing, which reduces transparency but website quality mitigates concerns.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Leaflet for mapping, Owl Carousel for UI components, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing platforms such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, Smartlook, and Navattic. The site is fast-loading, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not disclosed. The technical implementation is robust with good accessibility and performance metrics, supporting a professional and trustworthy user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with safetica.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review safetica.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.