Skip to main content

Security report for s-team.lu

S-Team · Government · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

S-Team is a government-backed non-profit initiative based in Luxembourg focused on preventing violence among youth in schools and educational institutions. The project engages young people to lead prevention activities and peer mediation, supported by national youth services and partner organizations. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides clear information about the project, partners, and contact details. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern libraries and frameworks, including Bootstrap and jQuery, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and Matomo analytics with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy assessment, but the presence of government logos and partner sites supports trustworthiness. Overall, the site is a credible, safe, and well-maintained platform for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching s-team.lu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates within the government and non-profit sectors, targeting youth in Luxembourg's educational system. It leverages partnerships with national youth services and social organizations to deliver violence prevention and peer mediation programs. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on social impact and community engagement. The website serves as an information hub and contact point for partners and participants. The presence of official logos and contact information enhances credibility. The project appears small in scale but well integrated within Luxembourg's youth service ecosystem, with potential for growth through partnerships and national activities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse. GDPR compliance is evident through cookie consent banners and detailed privacy policies. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from additional security hardening and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
S-Team
Description
Le projet « S-Team : Setz dech an ! » vise à prévenir la violence dans les lycées, écoles fondamentales et maisons relais en incitant les jeunes à réaliser leurs propres actions de prévention.
Key services
Violence prevention programs, Peer mediation training, Youth engagement activities, Partner collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Bootstrap, jQuery, Swiper, Fancybox, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-backed youth violence prevention initiative in Luxembourg.
  2. Content is in French and targeted at youth and educational institutions.
  3. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. No WHOIS data available to verify domain registration details.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and analytics with privacy considerations.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with official emails and phone numbers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Swiper for sliders, and Fancybox for media display. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used for spam prevention, and Matomo analytics is deployed for privacy-conscious visitor tracking. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and uses DNS prefetching to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are evident with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. No hosting provider details were found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with s-team.lu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review s-team.lu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.