Skip to main content

Security report for rwi.nl

MooieDomeinnaam.nl B.V. · Other · Netherlands

Critical risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

25/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MooieDomeinnaam.nl B.V. operates a specialized domain brokerage service focusing on premium Dutch .nl domain names, exemplified by the RWI.nl domain sales landing page. The company positions itself as a trusted intermediary offering secure transactions, invoicing, and domain ownership transfer services primarily targeting Dutch businesses and individuals, with international sales options. The website content is professionally structured, providing clear steps for domain acquisition and multiple contact channels, including email, phone, and WhatsApp. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and animation libraries like AOS and Owl Carousel. Payment processing is securely integrated via the reputable Pay.nl platform using iDEAL. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies and does not implement advanced security headers, which are areas for improvement. Analytics are conducted through Google Tag Manager, but no cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating partial privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses secure payment methods and does not expose sensitive data in its HTML. Nevertheless, the absence of security headers and anti-CSRF protections in forms suggests moderate security maturity. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the business identity, reinforcing trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rwi.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
20
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
25

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a niche position in the domain sales market, leveraging its official registrar status with SIDN to offer premium .nl domains. Its business model centers on direct domain sales with secure payment processing and invoice issuance. The target market is primarily Dutch SMEs and entrepreneurs seeking brandable domain names. The presence of customer testimonials and clear contact information enhances credibility. Partnerships with Pay.nl for payments and SIDN for domain registration underpin operational reliability. Growth potential lies in expanding the portfolio of premium domains and improving compliance and security features to attract a broader customer base.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. Secure payment processing via iDEAL and Pay.nl is a key strength, ensuring transactional security. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, limiting transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a domain sales landing page but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to improve usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MooieDomeinnaam.nl B.V.
Registration number
24380008
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MooieDomeinnaam.nl B.V.
Description
MooieDomeinnaam.nl B.V. is a company specializing in the sale of premium domain names, including RWI.nl, which is offered for acquisition. They provide a secure and straightforward purchasing process primarily targeting Dutch businesses and individuals seeking .nl domains.
Key services
Domain name sales, Secure payment via iDEAL, Invoice and ownership transfer services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.3, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Owl Carousel, FitText.js, Pay.nl (payment integration)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Secure payment via iDEAL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a landing page for selling the domain RWI.nl.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  4. Payment is processed securely via iDEAL through Pay.nl.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and responsive design techniques.
  7. No CMS detected; likely a custom or static site.
  8. No social media links found except WhatsApp contact.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  10. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery 2.1.3, supplemented by animation libraries (AOS) and carousel functionality (Owl Carousel). Payment integration is handled via Pay.nl using iDEAL, ensuring secure transactions. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and no advanced frameworks or platforms are detected. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rwi.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rwi.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.