Skip to main content

Security report for rvccr.cz

Ředitelství vodních cest ČR · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ředitelství vodních cest ČR is a Czech government agency responsible for managing and developing inland waterway infrastructure, including ports, harbors, locks, and navigable waterways such as the Labe, Vltava, and Baťův kanál. The website serves both professionals and the general public by providing information on waterway services, construction projects, and navigation aids. The agency positions itself as a key national authority in transportation infrastructure, focusing on safe and efficient water transport. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Mapbox GL JS for interactive maps, Google Fonts, and various JavaScript libraries to enhance user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and content relevant to its audience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit advanced security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain registration analysis, but the official .gov.cz domain and consistent content strongly indicate legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving as a reliable source for waterway infrastructure information in the Czech Republic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rvccr.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates as a government entity in the transportation sector, focusing on inland waterways. Its business model revolves around public infrastructure management and service provision rather than commercial revenue generation. The website targets multiple segments including waterway professionals, suppliers, and the general public interested in navigation and recreational use of waterways. The presence of detailed project information and public tenders indicates active infrastructure development and procurement activities. The agency maintains a transparent communication channel through news updates and social media, enhancing stakeholder engagement. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor anomaly but does not detract from the agency's established government role. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident, which could be improved to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No signs of exposed credentials, malware, or phishing were found. The use of third-party scripts like Mapbox and Google Fonts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, which is common for government sites but could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the site is secure for public informational use but could benefit from additional security hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish or provide access to a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ředitelství vodních cest ČR
Description
Ředitelství vodních cest ČR is a government entity responsible for managing and developing waterway infrastructure in the Czech Republic, including ports, harbors, locks, and navigable waterways such as the Labe, Vltava, and Baťův kanál. They provide public services for navigation, maintain and build infrastructure, and promote safe and efficient inland water transport.
Key services
Waterway infrastructure management, Port and harbor services, Public navigation services, Construction and maintenance of waterway facilities, Information and support for waterway users
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Mapbox GL JS, Google Fonts (Roboto), Popper.js, Tippy.js, jQuery (likely, inferred from plugins), Owl Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content
  5. Strong focus on waterway infrastructure and public services
  6. Use of modern web technologies and responsive design
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration analysis
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Mapbox GL JS for interactive mapping, Google Fonts for typography, and popular JavaScript libraries such as Popper.js and Tippy.js for UI enhancements. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content and interactive elements. The CMS or backend platform is not explicitly identified. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. The site could improve accessibility compliance and implement additional security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the agency's mission effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rvccr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rvccr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.