Skip to main content

Security report for rungie.com

Craig Hughes · Other · United States

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rungie.com is a personal website for Craig Hughes, primarily serving as a placeholder and a platform to share content and enable appointment bookings via Calendly. The site is simple, with basic content and clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address. The business model is personal branding and scheduling meetings, targeting general visitors or contacts interested in connecting with Craig. The website uses modern static site technology (Hugo) and Bootstrap for responsive design, hosted with DNS services from Amazon Registrar, Inc. The technical infrastructure is moderate in performance and mobile optimization, with basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections in place, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating limited compliance with GDPR or similar regulations. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, but privacy compliance is minimal. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is trustworthy and legitimate as a personal site, but improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and formal policies would enhance its security and professionalism. The domain is long-standing and consistent with the personal nature of the site, with no suspicious indicators detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rungie.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small personal brand with no commercial business operations. It does not compete in a traditional market but serves as a digital presence for Craig Hughes. The key service is appointment booking facilitated through an external Calendly link. The site’s simplicity and lack of commercial content suggest limited revenue streams and a focus on personal or professional networking. Social media presence on LinkedIn, GitHub, and Mastodon supports professional engagement. There are no partnerships or subsidiaries indicated. The site’s longevity since 2003 suggests stable personal use rather than commercial growth.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic but functional. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes client-side protections. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially for visitors from GDPR jurisdictions. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal site but would benefit from enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Include incident response contact information to improve security communication and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Craig Hughes
Description
Craig Hughes personal website, mostly a placeholder for content sharing.
Key services
Appointment booking
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal site with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the site; appointment booking is via external Calendly link.
  5. Uses Hugo static site generator and Bootstrap framework.
  6. Includes Google Tag Manager for analytics but no explicit privacy compliance.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Domain is well maintained with standard domain status protections.
  10. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator and styled with Bootstrap, providing a responsive and modern front-end framework. Hosting and DNS are managed via Amazon Registrar, Inc., indicating reliable infrastructure. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, but no other advanced marketing or advertising tools are detected. Performance is moderate with no broken elements or errors observed. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is minimally implemented with canonical tags and viewport meta tags. The site lacks advanced technical security features such as DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rungie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rungie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.