Skip to main content

Security report for ruci.lv

Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at ruci.lv is currently inaccessible, serving only a 404 Not Found error page with no meaningful content or business information. The lack of metadata, structured data, or any contact details indicates that the site is either inactive, misconfigured, or abandoned. The only external link present points to the LiteSpeed Web Server error page, confirming the server technology but providing no further insight into the site's purpose or ownership. Due to the absence of WHOIS data caused by query limits, no domain registration details could be extracted, further complicating trust and legitimacy assessments. From a technical perspective, the site uses LiteSpeed Web Server but lacks any modern web technologies, security headers, or HTTPS configuration visible in the provided data. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies indicates non-compliance with common data protection regulations such as GDPR. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, which limits exposure but also indicates no active user engagement. Security posture is poor, with no evidence of HTTPS, security headers, or incident response contacts. The domain's legitimacy is questionable due to the lack of WHOIS data and the site's non-functional state. Overall, the risk level is high for users attempting to interact with this domain, and the site does not currently provide any trustworthy or useful business or security information. Strategic recommendations include enabling HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, providing clear business and contact information, and resolving the 404 error to restore website functionality. Without these improvements, the domain remains low trust and potentially abandoned.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ruci.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence data could be extracted due to the absence of website content and metadata. The domain does not present any identifiable company name, services, or market positioning. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or strategic business relationships are evident. The lack of contact information and business descriptions suggests the domain is not actively used for commercial or organizational purposes.

Security posture

The security posture of the domain is currently very weak. No HTTPS or SSL configuration is visible, and no security headers are present. There are no privacy or cookie policies, no incident response contacts, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The site is essentially a default 404 error page served by LiteSpeed Web Server, indicating no active security management or compliance. This exposes the domain to risks such as phishing or misuse if reactivated without proper controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide clear and verifiable business contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  5. Resolve the 404 error and restore functional website content to improve trust and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
LiteSpeed Web Server

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website returns a 404 Not Found error page with no accessible content.
  2. No metadata, structured data, or SEO tags present.
  3. No forms, no contact information, no social media links detected.
  4. Only external link is to LiteSpeed Web Server error page.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  7. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  8. No business or security-related content present.
  9. Website appears inactive or misconfigured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on LiteSpeed Web Server but lacks any detectable CMS, frameworks, or modern web technologies. The HTML content is minimal and only serves a 404 error message. There is no evidence of performance optimization, mobile responsiveness, or SEO best practices. The absence of metadata and structured data indicates technical immaturity or abandonment. Hosting provider details beyond LiteSpeed are not available. Overall, the technical infrastructure is basic and non-functional.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ruci.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ruci.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.