Skip to main content

Security report for rubena.eu

Rubena, s.r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rubena, s.r.o. is a Czech manufacturing company specializing in a wide range of rubber products including V-belts, air springs, tyres, ice hockey pucks, and rubber molded parts. The company operates multiple e-commerce platforms to sell its products and supports multiple languages, indicating a focus on international markets. The website is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern tracking and consent management tools such as Google Analytics and CookieScript, and employs JavaScript frameworks like Naja for enhanced user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though security headers and incident response contacts could be improved. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for EU domains, and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its industrial manufacturing business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  5. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rubena.eu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rubena.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rubena.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a medium-sized manufacturer in the rubber products sector, targeting industrial and commercial clients. Its diversified product portfolio and multiple e-commerce channels suggest a robust business model combining manufacturing and direct online sales. The presence of trade conditions and privacy policies indicates compliance with regulatory requirements. The partnership with digital agencies and use of advanced analytics tools reflect a strategic approach to digital marketing and customer engagement. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site may indicate a preference for contact via forms or localized sales networks. The company appears well-established with consistent branding and multilingual support, enhancing its market reach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a published security.txt or explicit incident response contact reduces transparency for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and clearer incident response channels to improve trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  4. Enhance visibility of direct company contact information such as verified emails and phone numbers to improve customer trust and support.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing compliance with GDPR and other relevant regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rubena, s.r.o.
Description
Rubena, s.r.o. is a manufacturing company specializing in rubber products including V-belts, air springs, flexible and inflatable rubber products, tyres and tubes, ice hockey pucks, rubber molded parts, rubber compounds, and tools.
Key services
V-Belts, Air Springs & Power Elements, Flexible and Inflatable Rubber products, Tyres & Tubes, Ice Hockey Pucks, Rubber Molded Parts, Rubber Compounds, Tools, E-shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieScript Consent Management, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Naja (JavaScript framework)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy implemented
  3. Multiple language support enhances accessibility
  4. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting domain registration transparency
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  7. No explicit security.txt or incident response contact found
  8. Website content is focused on manufacturing rubber products
  9. Multiple e-commerce subdomains linked for product sales
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and CookieScript for analytics and consent management. The JavaScript framework Naja is employed for dynamic content rendering. CSS and JavaScript assets are properly linked, and the site is mobile optimized with responsive design. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. The site lacks some advanced security headers but otherwise follows good technical practices. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with opportunities for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rubena.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rubena.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.