Skip to main content

Security report for rtkk.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

53/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at rtkk.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, designed to block automated or suspicious traffic. It does not provide any business or product information, indicating that the site is either under protection or temporarily inaccessible to general visitors without passing the CAPTCHA. The presence of legacy CMS meta tags (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) suggests the underlying platform may be outdated, posing potential security risks if these versions are in use. The technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or business information is available on this page. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is currently in a protective state rather than a fully operational business presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rtkk.lv

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the nature of the page as a security challenge, no direct business intelligence can be derived. There is no visible company name, description, or contact information. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja's security services, which may indicate a business concerned with cybersecurity or simply a site under protection. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or market positioning information is available. The lack of business content and policies suggests the site is not currently serving its intended audience or is in a restricted access mode.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate given the use of BitNinja's CAPTCHA challenge and Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse. However, the lack of visible security headers, outdated CMS versions indicated in meta tags, and absence of privacy and cookie policies reduce the overall security maturity. The site uses HTTPS (implied by recaptcha.net and Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS), but SSL configuration details are unknown. The inability to access WHOIS data limits trust verification. The security challenge page itself is a positive control measure but also indicates prior security concerns or suspicious activity from the visitor IP.

Recommendations

  1. Update the underlying CMS to supported, secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide visible and verified contact information and business credentials on the main site to enhance credibility.
  5. Conduct a full security audit including SSL/TLS configuration and vulnerability scanning to ensure robust protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The page is a security challenge CAPTCHA by BitNinja indicating the visitor IP is greylisted and must pass CAPTCHA to proceed. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated or malicious traffic. It does not contain business or product information.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to block suspicious IPs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is a security CAPTCHA challenge page by BitNinja.
  2. No business or product information is presented on this page.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  4. Use of outdated CMS versions indicated in meta tags may be a security risk.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  6. No contact information or business credentials found.
  7. External scripts include Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA.
  8. Page is designed to block automated or suspicious traffic.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses legacy CMS meta tags indicating Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and unsupported, posing security risks if still in use. The page is a security challenge with Google reCAPTCHA v2 integration and Google Analytics tracking scripts. The HTML is valid but minimal, with no SEO optimization due to noindex, nofollow meta tags. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with a simple responsive design. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries detected beyond Google services. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is functional for a security challenge but lacks modern web standards and business site features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rtkk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rtkk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.