Skip to main content

Security report for rtgallery.net

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website rtgallery.net operates as an adult content platform specializing in explicit and controversial scenes such as rape, violence, humiliation, incest, and nudity extracted from mainstream movies. It targets an adults-only audience and offers both free and premium video content. The business model is niche and small scale, with no clear corporate branding or extensive business information. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies including jQuery and custom JavaScript, with Google Analytics and ShareThis for tracking and social sharing. The site is hosted by Hosting Concepts B.V. and uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security features such as DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact or incident response information is provided, indicating low privacy compliance and business credibility. The site includes an age verification modal but overall design and navigation are basic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rtgallery.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche segment in adult entertainment focusing on explicit and controversial content from mainstream films. It appears to operate independently without visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The business relies on user registrations and premium content access for revenue. Market positioning is low profile with minimal trust indicators or certifications. The lack of privacy and security policies may hinder growth and user trust. The presence of social sharing and analytics indicates some marketing efforts but transparency and compliance are lacking.

Security posture

Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security headers detected. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as lack of incident response contacts, indicates compliance gaps. The site uses an age verification modal but does not implement robust security best practices. Potential vulnerabilities include exposure to DNS attacks and lack of protection against common web threats. Overall security maturity is low, posing risks to user data and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance to improve legal standing and user trust.
  3. Add clear terms of service and contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Improve website design, navigation, and mobile responsiveness for better user experience.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Rapetub Gallery provides explicit sex scenes, rape, humiliation, and violence content extracted from mainstream movies.
Key services
Streaming explicit sex scenes, Access to premium and free adult video content, User registration and login
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, JsHttpRequest, Google Analytics, ShareThis
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Age verification modal implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis social sharing
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts explicit adult content with controversial themes including rape and incest.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or security incident response details available.
  4. Basic age verification modal implemented via JavaScript.
  5. Uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC.
  6. Includes social sharing via ShareThis and Google Analytics tracking.
  7. Content and design quality are basic with moderate mobile optimization.
  8. No CMS or major frameworks detected beyond jQuery and custom scripts.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent but minimal registrant info.
  10. No evidence of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with jQuery and custom JavaScript for interactivity, Google Analytics for tracking, and ShareThis for social sharing. The hosting provider is Hosting Concepts B.V. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for modern web security. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site does not appear to use a CMS or popular frameworks, indicating a custom or legacy build. Technical debt is moderate with opportunities for modernization and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rtgallery.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rtgallery.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.