Skip to main content

Security report for rsyd.dk

Region Syddanmark · Government · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Region Syddanmark operates as a public regional authority in Southern Denmark, focusing on healthcare, regional development, and environmental management. The website serves as an official portal providing information and services to the public and regional stakeholders. It maintains a strong market position as a government entity with a clear mandate and service scope. The digital presence is supported by modern web technologies including StencilJS and third-party tools like Cookiebot for privacy compliance and Monsido for accessibility monitoring. The site demonstrates good technical maturity with responsive design and accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rsyd.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rsyd.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
187
Employees
15
Customers
99
Third parties
73
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2026-06-06 · 24 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rsyd.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.rsyd.dk2026-06-06
  • –adfs.rsyd.dk2026-05-15
  • –adfs.rsyd.dk2026-05-11
  • –logon.rsyd.dk2025-11-13
  • –logon.rsyd.dk2025-08-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization targets residents and stakeholders within the Southern Denmark region, delivering essential public services. Its business model is that of a government authority funded by public resources, focusing on healthcare and environmental management. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, reinforcing trust and legitimacy. The use of multiple analytics and tracking tools indicates a data-driven approach to service improvement, balanced with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. No commercial or affiliate relationships are evident, consistent with its public service nature.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting adherence to privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts is a gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional security headers and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Continue monitoring and optimizing website accessibility and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Region Syddanmark
Description
Region Syddanmark er en offentlig myndighed med forskellige opgaver inden for sundhedsområdet, Regional Udvikling og Vand - og jordforurening.
Key services
Healthcare services, Regional development, Water and soil pollution management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
StencilJS, Cludo search, Cookiebot, Monsido, Microsoft Power BI
Frameworks
StencilJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Snowplow Analytics, Monsido, New Relic, Microsoft Power BI
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Monsido, Amazon (Snowplow Analytics), New Relic, Ontame.io, Qbrick, Vocast
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Cludo, Monsido
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional government portal for Southern Denmark.
  2. Compliant cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and accessibility considerations.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking services used with consent.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (StencilJS) and integrates third-party services for search (Cludo), cookie consent (Cookiebot), and accessibility monitoring (Monsido). The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and accessible user experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer business contact information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rsyd.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rsyd.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.