Skip to main content

Security report for rsd.cz

Ředitelství silnic a dálnic s. p. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ředitelství silnic a dálnic s. p. is the Czech Republic's national government agency responsible for the construction, modernization, repair, maintenance, and management of highways and first-class roads. The website reflects a well-established public sector entity with a domain registered since 1997, consistent with its long operational history. The site targets the general public, government stakeholders, and contractors, providing comprehensive information about road infrastructure projects, public tenders, and traffic information services. The business model is that of a government agency focused on transportation infrastructure management.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of rsd.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rsd.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as the authoritative body for road infrastructure in the Czech Republic. It leverages partnerships with related traffic information and infrastructure service sites, enhancing its ecosystem. The website content is professionally maintained, with clear contact details and relevant resources for stakeholders. The agency's operations are transparent, with GDPR compliance and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating maturity in regulatory adherence. The presence of career and partner sites suggests active engagement with workforce and service providers.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses secure forms with validation. While explicit security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options are not visibly configured in the HTML, the site shows no signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The use of an older jQuery version may pose some risk, and security policies or incident response information are not publicly disclosed, indicating areas for improvement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header policies and updated libraries.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other third-party libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Continue monitoring and auditing the website for security and privacy compliance to maintain trust and regulatory adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ředitelství silnic a dálnic s. p.
Registration number
KVK
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ředitelství silnic a dálnic s. p.
Description
Stavíme, modernizujeme, opravujeme, udržujeme a spravujeme dálnice a silnice I. třídy
Key services
Construction, Modernization, Repair, Maintenance, Management of highways and first-class roads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Liferay Portal, YUI 3, jQuery 1.12.4, React 16.12.0, Clay UI, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Liferay, AUI (Alloy UI)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government portal for Czech Republic road and highway management
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented
  3. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance are implemented
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  5. Use of Liferay CMS with modern frontend technologies
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay CMS platform, utilizing a combination of YUI, jQuery, React, and Clay UI for frontend components. The infrastructure appears stable with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses Google Analytics for traffic analysis with cookie consent mechanisms in place. The technical implementation is modern but could be improved by updating legacy libraries and enhancing accessibility features. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with the organization's geographic and operational profile.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rsd.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rsd.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.