Skip to main content

Security report for rsac.org

Bata · Other · Indonesia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website presents itself as an online lottery agent service named POS4D, offering various lottery markets and betting options primarily targeting Indonesian users. However, the domain www.superdataresearch.com does not align with the content, which is hosted and styled as a Bata brand e-commerce site, indicating a significant content-domain mismatch. The technical infrastructure leverages Salesforce Commerce Cloud with integrations of Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and other tracking tools, showing moderate digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to missing WHOIS data, lack of security headers, and absence of privacy and cookie policies, raising concerns about legitimacy and compliance. Overall, the site exhibits suspicious characteristics that warrant caution.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rsac.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model appears to be online lottery and gambling services targeting Indonesian customers, with payment options including QRIS, DANA, and bank transfers. The site references Bata brand assets and navigation, suggesting possible domain misuse or content injection. There is no clear evidence of legitimate domain registration or ownership. The target audience is mature users interested in lottery betting. The site lacks trust indicators such as certifications or comprehensive policies, which undermines credibility.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The absence of WHOIS registration data and domain registration inconsistencies are major red flags. No security headers or incident response contacts are found. Privacy compliance is poor with no visible privacy or cookie policies. The extensive use of tracking scripts without transparency further reduces trust. The site is vulnerable to phishing suspicion due to content-domain mismatch and lack of verifiable business information.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and register domain properly with accurate WHOIS information.
  2. Align website content with domain brand to avoid phishing suspicion.
  3. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with regulations.
  4. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security.
  5. Establish clear contact and incident response channels for user trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bata
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bata
Description
POS4D adalah agen togel online resmi dan terpercaya 2025 yang menghadirkan pasaran togel terlengkap seperti Singapore, Hongkong, Sydney, dan Toto Macau dengan hasil resmi yang diupdate setiap hari. Sebagai situs toto top #1 terpercaya, POS4D menjamin keamanan, privasi, fair play, serta pembayaran 100% tanpa delay. Nikmati berbagai jenis taruhan seperti 4D, colok bebas, dan shio dengan diskon dan hadiah togel terbesar di kelasnya. Tersedia deposit via QRIS, DANA, dan transfer bank 24 jam nonstop tanpa potongan, dengan minimal deposit 10 ribu untuk kemudahan Anda bermain togel online kapan saja.
Key services
online lottery agent services, togel market access, online betting
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Fonts, jQuery (implied by scripts), Slick Carousel
Platforms
Demandware (Salesforce Commerce Cloud)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, CQuotient
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
CQuotient
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is unrelated to the domain name and brand (Bata) suggesting possible domain misuse or hijacking.
  2. WHOIS data is missing indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection that is not disclosed.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating poor compliance.
  4. Multiple external domains used for hosting content and images, some unrelated to the main domain.
  5. Tracking and analytics scripts are extensively used, but privacy compliance is poor.
  6. Website promotes online gambling/lottery services in Indonesian language targeting mature audience.
  7. Technical infrastructure uses Salesforce Commerce Cloud platform but content is inconsistent.
  8. No visible security headers or policies detected in provided data.
  9. Potential phishing or scam indicators due to content/domain mismatch and WHOIS absence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Salesforce Commerce Cloud platform with modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization present. However, the content is inconsistent and appears injected or mismatched with the domain. Hosting is via Akamai CDN. The site lacks accessibility features and SEO optimization is basic. Technical debt is implied by the content mismatch and missing security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rsac.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rsac.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.