Skip to main content

Security report for rpk.lv

Food Union · Manufacturing · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Food Union is a well-established Latvian dairy and food manufacturing company with a leading market position since 1909. The company operates a professional website primarily targeting consumers and business partners in the Baltic region. The site provides comprehensive information about their products, brands, sustainability efforts, and corporate details. Technically, the website is built on a modern React framework, integrating Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policy disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust verification, though the website content and external links suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, with room for improvement in security policy transparency and incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rpk.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Food Union holds a strong position in the dairy manufacturing sector in Latvia, with a history dating back to 1909. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and retailing dairy products under various brands, targeting both local consumers and regional markets. The company maintains a professional digital presence with active social media channels and clear contact information. Their partnership with Food Union Group indicates a broader corporate structure. The website's integration of marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager supports data-driven business decisions. The company demonstrates compliance with GDPR through detailed privacy and cookie policies. However, the lack of visible certifications or security incident response information suggests potential areas for corporate governance enhancement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which could hinder effective vulnerability management and breach response. The lack of a security.txt file further limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve site security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Food Union
Description
Piensaimniecības nozares vadošā loma kopš 1909. gada
Key services
Dairy product manufacturing, Brand management, Retail distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  3. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and accessible
  4. Contact information includes physical address and phone number with clear labeling
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube
  6. Modern React-based frontend with Google Analytics and Tag Manager integration
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React with multiple JavaScript chunk files indicating a modular frontend architecture. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses modern web manifest and favicon standards. Performance appears moderate with some loading animations and SVG graphics. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, indicating a secure transport layer. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with opportunities for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rpk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rpk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.