Skip to main content

Security report for roznava.sk

Mesto Rožňava · Government · Slovakia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.roznava.sk is the official digital presence of the city of Rožňava, Slovakia, serving as a comprehensive portal for municipal information, services, and citizen engagement. It targets residents, visitors, and local businesses by providing detailed sections on governance, transparency, electronic services, education, business, and cultural events. The site maintains a consistent and professional brand image with good content quality and navigation clarity. Technically, the site employs a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, OwlCarousel, and cookie consent tools, ensuring good mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The site is secured with HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting some GDPR compliance efforts. However, it lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security policies, which are important for full compliance and trust. From a security perspective, the site shows a solid baseline with HTTPS and no detected vulnerabilities or WAF blocking. The absence of security headers and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. No tracking or advertising scripts beyond cookie consent are present, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the site is a trustworthy and functional municipal portal with good business credibility but requires enhancements in privacy and security policy transparency to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roznava.sk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rožňava's official website positions itself as a key information hub for the city, supporting transparency and citizen services. Its business model is public service oriented, focusing on delivering government information and facilitating access to municipal services. The site leverages partnerships with local e-government platforms and community forums, enhancing its ecosystem. The content and structure indicate a medium-sized municipal operation with a focus on community engagement and cultural promotion. Growth indicators include active event calendars and digital service offerings. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its government entity nature.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers, which are critical for comprehensive security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance gaps exist in privacy policy publication and GDPR transparency. The site does not appear to use extensive tracking or analytics, reducing privacy risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible, suggesting potential areas for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify user obligations and site usage policies.
  3. Implement and disclose a security policy including incident response contacts and procedures.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mesto Rožňava
Description
Oficiálna webová stránka mesta Rožňava poskytuje informácie o samospráve, transparentnosti, elektronických službách, občianskych záležitostiach, školstve, podnikaní, návštevníkoch a kontaktoch mesta Rožňava.
Key services
Informácie o samospráve, Transparentné mesto - rozpočet, zmluvy, dotácie, Elektronické služby a formuláre, Občianske služby a informácie, Školstvo a vzdelávacie inštitúcie, Podpora podnikateľov, Informácie pre návštevníkov, Kalendár akcií a spravodajstvo, Kontaktné informácie
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, OwlCarousel, Popper.js, Malihu Custom Scrollbar, TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website for the city of Rožňava, Slovakia.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured covering multiple city services and information.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating some GDPR awareness.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Uses common web technologies and libraries with no obvious vulnerabilities.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook and YouTube official pages.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  9. Website is HTTPS secured with no WAF blocking or challenge.
  10. Good accessibility and mobile optimization observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, OwlCarousel, and other common JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and interactive user experience. The presence of cookie consent scripts indicates attention to privacy compliance. The site appears to be custom-developed or uses a proprietary CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are implemented well, including font size controls and language options. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, though structured data like JSON-LD was not found. Hosting details are not explicit, but no WAF or CDN blocking was detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roznava.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roznava.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.