Skip to main content

Security report for royalvegascasino.com

Royal Vegas Casino · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Royal Vegas Casino is an established online gambling platform offering a wide range of casino games including slots, table games, and live dealer experiences. The site targets global online casino players with a strong emphasis on mobile and desktop accessibility. Powered by reputable software providers like Apricot and Evolution Gaming, Royal Vegas positions itself as a premium online casino with over 20 years of experience. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with modern technologies, responsive design, and comprehensive content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent mechanisms, and trusted certifications such as the Kahnawake Gaming Commission license and eCogra assurance. However, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit contact information slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the platform is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a credible player in the online gambling market.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of royalvegascasino.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching royalvegascasino.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Royal Vegas Casino operates in the competitive online gambling sector, leveraging a business model based on gaming services, loyalty rewards, and VIP programs. The company is licensed and regulated, which enhances its market position and trustworthiness. Its partnership ecosystem includes software providers and affiliate programs, supporting a broad offering of games and marketing reach. The platform's focus on mobile gaming and user experience aligns with current market trends. While the domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, the business information indicates a medium-sized entity under Baytree Interactive Ltd, registered in Guernsey. The lack of direct contact details on the website suggests a preference for support via help center subdomains and online channels.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent banners with management options, reflecting good privacy compliance. Trusted certifications and responsible gaming links indicate a mature security culture. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML source, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The use of multiple third-party scripts and analytics tools introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. The absence of a security.txt file and data protection officer contact reduces transparency in vulnerability disclosure and data protection governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and improving incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Enhance transparency by publishing data protection officer contact details.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Registration number
69691
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Royal Vegas Casino
Description
Royal Vegas Casino offers a safe and secure online casino environment with over 400 premium games including slots, table games, progressive jackpots, and live casino games. It targets online casino players globally with a focus on mobile and desktop platforms. The business model is based on online gambling and gaming services with loyalty and VIP programs. The site is powered by Apricot and Evolution Gaming software providers. The industry is E-commerce. The detected country is N/A. The size is medium. Founded date is not explicitly found but claims over 20 years of operation. Parent company is Baytree Interactive Ltd. Subsidiaries are not listed. Content quality is excellent. Branding consistency is consistent. Trust indicators include licensing by Kahnawake Gaming Commission and eCogra certification.
Key services
Online casino games, Slots, Table games, Live dealer games, Mobile casino app, Loyalty rewards
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Swiper.js, ePrivacy plugin, ReferAFriend plugin, Cloudflare Insights
Platforms
Desktop, Mobile (iOS, Android)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with management options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure payment methods
  • Responsible gaming tools

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
ReferAFriend plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong focus on user experience and mobile optimization
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  6. Multiple trusted certifications and licenses displayed
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, and custom privacy plugins, ensuring a responsive and interactive user experience. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of third-party scripts and caching strategies. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent areas for technical and operational improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with royalvegascasino.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review royalvegascasino.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.