Skip to main content

Security report for royaltyrange.com

Royalty Range · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Royalty Range is a specialized data provider offering professional databases covering royalty rates, service fees, loan rates, and companies' financials. The company targets businesses and professionals requiring detailed financial and royalty-related data, positioning itself as a niche player in the technology and data services sector. The website is built on WordPress and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter (X), and LinkedIn supports its digital footprint. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data and explicit contact information slightly reduces trust but does not detract from the overall professional presentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching royaltyrange.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates on a subscription or data service model, providing valuable financial and royalty data to a targeted audience. Its market position is that of a specialized niche provider with a focus on data accuracy and professional service. The integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the lack of visible contact details and terms of service may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but social media links suggest active engagement. Growth indicators and parent or subsidiary relationships are not disclosed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish clear terms of service and incident response policies to improve legal compliance and customer trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Royalty Range
Description
RoyaltyRange is a data provider with 4 professional databases covering Royalty rates, Service fees, Loan rates, Companies' financials.
Key services
Royalty rates database, Service fees database, Loan rates database, Companies' financials database
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, LiveChat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Microsoft Advertising
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LiveChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking detected
  2. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage content
  4. Social media links to Facebook, Twitter (X), and LinkedIn are present
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common analytics and marketing scripts
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered in the queried database
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and LiveChat. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional design. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with royaltyrange.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review royaltyrange.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.