Skip to main content

Security report for roubaix-lapiscine.com

Musée La Piscine de Roubaix · Government · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Musée La Piscine de Roubaix is a cultural institution and museum located in France, dedicated to art and industry. It serves a broad audience including tourists, art enthusiasts, and local visitors, offering exhibitions, educational activities, and virtual tours. The museum is supported by the City of Roubaix and various partners, positioning it as an important regional cultural entity. The website reflects this with professional design, consistent branding, and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries, providing moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policies are published. The WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trust from a registration perspective, but the website content and partner affiliations strongly indicate legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy, safe, and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in security transparency and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roubaix-lapiscine.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention roubaix-lapiscine.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for roubaix-lapiscine.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum operates within the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on cultural preservation and public education. Its business model relies on public funding, partnerships, and visitor services such as ticket sales, museum shop, and restaurant. The website supports these activities by providing information, ticketing links, and virtual engagement. The museum maintains partnerships with local government, tourism offices, and financial institutions, enhancing its market position. The digital presence is mature with SEO optimization and social media integration, targeting a general audience interested in culture and tourism. Growth opportunities include expanding digital engagement and improving accessibility. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security baseline with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and social media SDKs introduces moderate tracking but is common for cultural institutions. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but does not directly impact website security. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the site's purpose but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader audience inclusion.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Musée La Piscine de Roubaix
Description
Musée d'Art et d'Industrie André Diligent, one of the most beautiful museums in the Lille metropolitan area.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Cultural visits and activities, Museum shop and restaurant, Virtual tours
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Fancybox, bxSlider
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the museum.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Site uses HTTPS with good security practices but lacks some security headers.
  5. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  6. No explicit privacy policy page found but legal notice page likely contains privacy info.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact form used.
  8. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram is active.
  9. Use of multiple external trusted domains for partners and resources.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of jQuery, bxSlider, Fancybox, and Google services for analytics and tag management. The site uses Yoast SEO for optimization and loads fonts and icons from Google APIs. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading but could be improved with better mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. The technical stack is standard for cultural institutions, providing a balance between functionality and ease of maintenance. No hosting provider information was detected. The site uses a cookie consent banner and language cookie for localization. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roubaix-lapiscine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roubaix-lapiscine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.