Skip to main content

Security report for rosickets.cz

Rosické TS, příspěvková organizace · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rosické TS is a municipal contributory organization established by the city of Rosice in 2007 to provide essential public services such as city cleaning, waste management, public lighting maintenance, and road upkeep. The organization serves the local community and operates under the governance of the city council. The website reflects this public service role with clear contact information and descriptions of services offered. Technically, the website uses legacy JavaScript libraries like jQuery and MooTools, with a moderate performance profile and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but lacks advanced security headers and published privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust, but the website content and contact details support legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and informative but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rosickets.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government sector, focusing on municipal technical services. Its business model is service-oriented, funded and overseen by the city of Rosice. The website targets local residents and stakeholders requiring municipal services. The lack of social media presence and limited digital marketing tools suggests a low emphasis on external outreach. The partnership with Galileo Corporation for website development indicates professional support. Growth indicators are not evident, consistent with a stable municipal service provider. The organization maintains a clear and consistent brand identity aligned with its public service mission.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and a cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small municipal website but with room for improvement to meet modern standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rosické TS, příspěvková organizace
VAT number
CZ75105420
Registration number
75105420
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rosické TS, příspěvková organizace
Description
Rosické TS is a contributory organization established by the city of Rosice to maintain cleanliness, appearance, and functionality of public spaces and facilities within the city. Services include city cleaning, waste collection center operation, public lighting maintenance, greenery upkeep, road marking repairs, road maintenance, hazardous waste handling, freight transport, and cemetery maintenance.
Key services
City cleaning, Waste collection center operation, Public lighting maintenance, Greenery maintenance, Road marking and road maintenance, Hazardous waste handling, Freight transport, Cemetery maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, MooTools, Highslide JS, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by base href https://)
  • Cookie consent script present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website content is professionally presented but lacks some standard compliance pages like privacy policy and terms of service.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with official email and phone numbers.
  5. No social media presence detected.
  6. Technical stack uses older JavaScript libraries but functional.
  7. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  8. No analytics or tracking services detected.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but base href uses HTTPS.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses older but stable JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and MooTools, along with Highslide for image display and Font Awesome for icons. The CSS and JS files are versioned, indicating some maintenance. The site is hosted with HTTPS enabled as per base href, but no hosting provider or CMS is identified. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. Accessibility features like skip links and ARIA roles are present, indicating some attention to accessibility. SEO is basic with meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. The site could benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rosickets.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rosickets.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.