Skip to main content

Security report for rosenthal.lv

Rosenthal · Other · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rosenthal Law Firm is a boutique legal practice based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in a broad range of legal services including business transactions, litigation, commercial law, real estate, immigration, labor law, banking, IT, international trade, tax planning, and contract drafting. The firm emphasizes confidentiality and trust, reflected in its slogan “Sub rosa”. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with SEO optimization and multilingual support, targeting individuals and businesses requiring legal assistance in Latvia and internationally. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain emails and phone numbers, enhancing business credibility. Technical infrastructure includes WordPress CMS, Yoast SEO, Slick Carousel, and Matomo analytics, indicating a modern digital presence with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers, though privacy compliance could be improved by implementing cookie consent mechanisms and detailed GDPR statements. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification, but website content and presentation suggest legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, publishing terms of service, and adding incident response contacts to strengthen security and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rosenthal.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rosenthal operates as a small boutique law firm with a focused service portfolio catering to both local and international clients. Its competitive advantage lies in experienced licensed attorneys and a comprehensive approach to legal services across multiple sectors. The firm’s business model is service-oriented, relying on professional legal advisory and representation. The website content indicates a stable market position with clear branding and trust signals such as professional biographies and contact details. The firm appears to be founded in 2015 and maintains a consistent brand identity. The absence of WHOIS data limits external verification but does not detract from the professional presentation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The firm uses Matomo analytics for user tracking, suggesting a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers present, including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of visible forms reduces attack surface. However, privacy compliance is partial due to lack of cookie consent and detailed GDPR policy. No incident response or security contact information is published, which is a gap in security readiness. The use of Matomo analytics indicates user tracking but without explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by privacy and incident response improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements and data retention details.
  3. Add terms of service and incident response contact information to enhance legal and security transparency.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet broader compliance and usability standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rosenthal
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rosenthal
Description
Rosenthal is a boutique law firm based in Riga, Latvia, offering comprehensive legal services including strategic planning, litigation, commercial legal support, real estate, immigration, labor law, banking, IT, international trade, tax planning, and contract drafting.
Key services
Strategic planning and supervision of business transactions, Litigation and dispute resolution, Legal support of commercial activities, Real estate and construction, Immigration matters, Labour relations and employment, Banking transactions, IT and other technologies, International trade, Tax planning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Slick Carousel, Matomo Analytics
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • No forms with sensitive inputs detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed boutique law firm site with comprehensive legal service descriptions.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and multilingual support (Latvian, English, Russian).
  3. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the homepage.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain emails and phone numbers.
  5. No privacy or cookie consent banners visible, indicating partial GDPR compliance.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  7. Uses Matomo analytics for user tracking, but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  8. No visible social media links found in the provided content.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No incident response or security contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and Slick Carousel for interactive content display. It uses Matomo for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-conscious tracking. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as ajax.googleapis.com and cdn.jsdelivr.net. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. The HTML and CSS are valid and well structured. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and security headers, contributing to a secure browsing experience. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rosenthal.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rosenthal.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.