Skip to main content

Security report for rosendahlnextrom.com

Rosendahl Nextrom GmbH · Manufacturing · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rosendahl Nextrom GmbH is a well-established global leader in production technologies serving the battery, cable & wire, and optical fiber industries. The company offers sophisticated manufacturing equipment and tailor-made solutions, targeting industrial manufacturers worldwide. The website reflects a mature business with a professional digital presence, including multi-language support and structured data for SEO. Technically, the site uses WordPress with Elementor and performance optimizations like WP Rocket, hosted behind Cloudflare CDN. However, a critical security gap exists as the site lacks HTTPS/SSL encryption, exposing users to potential risks. Privacy compliance is addressed with a privacy policy and cookie consent via Cookiebot. Business credibility is strong with clear contact forms and parent company affiliation to KNILL Gruppe. Overall, the site is content-rich and professionally maintained but requires urgent security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rosendahlnextrom.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rosendahlnextrom.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
25%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rosendahlnextrom.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a B2B business model, supplying advanced production equipment for lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries, cables, wires, and optical fibers. It holds a global market position with projects in over 73 countries and is part of the historic KNILL Gruppe. The website highlights strategic business units, service offerings, and a strong emphasis on quality and customization. The presence of dedicated job portals for Austria and Finland indicates regional market penetration and growth. The company leverages modern web technologies and maintains good SEO and privacy practices, supporting its competitive advantage and customer engagement.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS/SSL, no modern TLS protocols, and missing security headers beyond basic X-Content-Type-Options. No HSTS or OCSP stapling is configured, and session resumption is disabled. While cookies are set with secure flags, the lack of encryption undermines overall security. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are found on the site. This exposes the business and its customers to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. Immediate remediation is required to implement SSL/TLS and enhance security headers to meet industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  3. Configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable legacy protocols.
  4. Add additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Establish and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  6. Regularly audit and update all third-party libraries and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  7. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization for broader user inclusivity.
  8. Maintain transparency in data retention policies and improve privacy compliance disclosures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and enhanced with WP Rocket for performance optimization. It uses jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. Hosting is via Cloudflare CDN providing caching and some security layers. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, the lack of HTTPS is a major technical deficiency. Performance metrics are not available but the use of WP Rocket and CDN suggests moderate to good performance. The site uses lazy loading for images and scripts, improving load times. Technical debt appears low but security modernization is urgently needed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rosendahlnextrom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rosendahlnextrom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.