Skip to main content

Security report for ropejumping.lv

Ropejumping.lv · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ropejumping.lv is a small active recreation business based in Latvia specializing in rope jumping activities, including individual and tandem jumps. The website is professionally designed using the Wix platform and targets adventure sports enthusiasts in the Baltic region. The business offers unique experiences that are more extreme than traditional bungee jumping, positioning itself in a niche market segment. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies and integrates analytics and error monitoring tools such as Google Analytics and Sentry, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security policies to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ropejumping.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the active recreation sector, focusing on rope jumping services in Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing adventure sports experiences to individuals and groups, likely generating revenue through bookings and gift cards. The website's structured data and contact information support its legitimacy and local presence. Market positioning is niche with limited direct competition in the Baltic region. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information suggests a small-scale operation. The use of Wix indicates a cost-effective approach to digital presence. Growth potential may depend on expanding marketing efforts and improving compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency in security management. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Sentry introduces some risk, but no vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Enhancing security headers, implementing privacy policies, and establishing incident response contacts would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider professional security assessment and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ropejumping.lv
Description
Izaicini sevi un savus draugus uz augstākajiem lēcieniem Baltijā ar Ropejumping.lv! Šis ir kas trakāks, kā gumijlēkšana, šie ir lēcieni ar virvēm gan individuāli, gan tandēmā.
Key services
rope jumping, tandem rope jumping, adventure sports activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Sentry (error monitoring), core-js polyfills
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy not explicitly detected
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website built on Wix platform with professional design
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found
  3. Contact phone and address present in structured data
  4. No forms detected in provided HTML snippet
  5. No email addresses or social media links explicitly found
  6. HTTPS enabled with no visible SSL issues
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Sentry for monitoring
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  9. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML content
  10. No evidence of security incidents or disclosures
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's proprietary CMS and hosting services. It incorporates modern JavaScript libraries and polyfills to support browser compatibility. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics and monitoring scripts. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive design and viewport meta tags. SEO is basic with meta descriptions, canonical links, and Open Graph tags present. Accessibility features are minimal but include skip-to-content buttons and focus management. The lack of visible forms in the provided HTML limits assessment of input security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but could be enhanced with improved accessibility and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ropejumping.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ropejumping.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.