Skip to main content

Security report for roofgardensclub.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.roofgardensclub.com is a Japanese-language affiliate marketing site focused on recommending ceramide-containing facial cleansers. It provides educational content about ceramide benefits, skin type-specific advice, and ranks popular products with affiliate links primarily through the A8.net network. The site targets Japanese consumers interested in skincare, particularly those seeking moisturizing and gentle cleansing solutions. Technically, the site is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with moderate mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, it uses an uncommon Shift_JIS charset which may limit accessibility and SEO effectiveness. Security posture is moderate but lacks HTTPS confirmation and security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact information is provided, which reduces trust and compliance standing. The WHOIS lookup failed to find domain registration data, raising concerns about domain legitimacy despite active content presence. Overall, the site functions as a niche affiliate marketing platform with room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roofgardensclub.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a small-scale affiliate marketing business in the skincare niche, focusing on ceramide facial cleansers. Its business model relies on content marketing and affiliate commissions via A8.net. The site links extensively to external skincare and cosmetic-related domains, indicating a broad topical focus. The lack of company information, contact details, and WHOIS registration data suggests a low-profile or possibly anonymous operator. The site’s market position is niche and content-driven, targeting Japanese skincare consumers. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals, adding compliance documentation, and enhancing technical infrastructure. The affiliate ecosystem is leveraged effectively but transparency and legitimacy concerns may impact long-term sustainability.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site lacks visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring secure communications. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The missing WHOIS registration data is a significant red flag, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not disclosed. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing contact information for security incidents to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Provide clear contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides information and product recommendations related to ceramide-containing facial cleansers, focusing on skincare benefits, usage tips, and product rankings.
Key services
Skincare product reviews, Affiliate product recommendations, Educational content on ceramide cleansing
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected, reducing input risk

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
A8.net
Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Research Artisan Pro tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is in Japanese and focused on ceramide facial cleansers with affiliate marketing links.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  6. Site uses affiliate marketing network A8.net and tracking by Research Artisan Pro.
  7. No forms or user input fields detected, reducing attack surface.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data.
  9. Site uses Shift_JIS charset, which is uncommon and may affect SEO and accessibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) without a detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The charset is Shift_JIS, which is uncommon and may affect SEO and accessibility negatively. The site loads external scripts for affiliate tracking and analytics (Research Artisan Pro). Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta viewport and canonical tags, and structured data is present but minimal (breadcrumb list only). There is no evidence of modern frameworks or hosting provider details. Technical risks include outdated charset usage and lack of HTTPS confirmation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roofgardensclub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roofgardensclub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.