Skip to main content

Security report for rondayvoo.com

Event Engine CMS Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rondayvoo is a specialized service provider offering event website design and management solutions, targeting event organizers and marketers seeking conversion-optimized, easy-to-manage websites integrated with ticketing and registration platforms. The company operates under Event Engine CMS Ltd, with a domain age consistent with its stated 15+ years of experience. The website is built on WordPress using the Bricks Builder theme, incorporating modern web technologies and third-party services such as Cookiebot for cookie consent and Visitor Queue for analytics. While the site is professionally designed and mobile-optimized, a key security control, Google reCAPTCHA, is misconfigured with an invalid site key, which may expose the contact form to spam risks. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no explicit terms of service or security policies are found. Overall, the website demonstrates a good security posture with room for improvement in form security and HTTP headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rondayvoo.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rondayvoo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rondayvoo.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rondayvoo positions itself as a niche player in the event technology sector, leveraging a combination of templated and bespoke website solutions to attract event attendees and sponsors. Its business model focuses on providing both self-managed CMS tools and agency-led services, supported by a partner ecosystem including Burge Agency and Event Engine. The company emphasizes integration with popular event management platforms and livestreaming capabilities, catering to hybrid and digital event formats. Social media engagement across major platforms supports brand visibility. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused market approach and a clear value proposition centered on event website conversion and ease of use.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the invalid Google reCAPTCHA site key on the contact form is a notable vulnerability that could lead to spam or abuse. Security headers are not explicitly detected, suggesting potential gaps in defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security readiness. The use of third-party scripts and analytics is managed with consent, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to mitigate risks from external dependencies.

Recommendations

  1. Correct the Google reCAPTCHA site key configuration to enable effective spam protection on the contact form.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Event Engine CMS Ltd
Description
Rondayvoo provides event website design and management solutions, offering easy-to-manage, conversion-focused websites that integrate with event management platforms. They offer templated and tailored website options, video demos, and expert support to help event organizers attract attendees and sponsors.
Key services
Event website design, Content management system, Integration with ticketing and registration platforms, Livestreaming support, Expert agency support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bricks Builder theme, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, Font Awesome, HTML5 video
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Google reCAPTCHA (though site key invalid)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Visitor Queue
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
visitorqueue.com
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Visitor Queue
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Bricks theme and custom child theme.
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. Contact form present but Google reCAPTCHA site key is invalid, reducing spam protection effectiveness.
  4. Social media presence on YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond privacy and cookie policies.
  6. No terms of service or incident response contact found.
  7. No visible certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  8. External links mostly to partners, social media, and trusted third-party services.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Bricks Builder theme and a custom child theme, leveraging HTML5 video, Font Awesome icons, and Google Fonts. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie management, and Visitor Queue provides analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve performance. Hosting is managed via NameCheap, Inc. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with meta tags and Open Graph data, but accessibility could be improved. The invalid reCAPTCHA key and lack of explicit security headers represent technical risks that should be addressed to strengthen the overall security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rondayvoo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rondayvoo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.