Skip to main content

Security report for romanian-companies.eu

RomanianCompanies · Other · Romania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RomanianCompanies.eu is a data service platform providing comprehensive information on Romanian companies including contact details, financial data, legal status, and monitoring services. The platform targets businesses and individuals seeking detailed company data and offers both free and subscription-based access models. It holds a moderate market position with notable clients such as Altex, Emag, and Mercedes, indicating trust and relevance in the Romanian business data sector. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts, hosted on infrastructure using Google Cloud DNS. However, the SSL certificate is invalid and does not match the domain, which undermines user trust and security. The site lacks TLS protocol support and HSTS, exposing it to potential security risks. Security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are implemented, but cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance are minimal or absent. Overall, the platform demonstrates good content quality and user experience but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching romanian-companies.eu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model revolves around providing detailed company data and monitoring services for Romanian companies, including insolvency tracking, court files, and financial filtering. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans and pay-per-access services such as SMS access. The target audience includes business analysts, investors, legal professionals, and companies needing due diligence data. The presence of partner domains like listafirme.ro and membri.listafirme.ro indicates an ecosystem for user management and extended services. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive data coverage and monitoring capabilities. Growth indicators include integration of APIs and active user engagement via social media groups. Strategic partnerships and client logos enhance credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with some positive practices such as secure cookies and security headers (X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options). However, the invalid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support represent critical vulnerabilities that could expose users to man-in-the-middle attacks and data interception. The absence of HSTS and cookie consent mechanisms further weakens security and privacy compliance, especially under GDPR. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The platform should prioritize fixing SSL issues, enabling modern TLS protocols, and implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Correct the SSL certificate to match the domain and enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  3. Add a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy.
  4. Publish detailed privacy, security, and incident response policies including contact channels.
  5. Enhance security monitoring and incident response readiness to protect user data and platform integrity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a stable and widely adopted technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 3.4.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, and Google Fonts, ensuring good frontend performance and responsiveness. Hosting is supported by Google Cloud DNS, providing reliable DNS resolution. Performance is fast with minimal resource overhead. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and structured data (JSON-LD) for website and search actions. However, the SSL configuration is poor with no TLS enabled and an invalid certificate, posing significant risks. The absence of DNSSEC and MX records suggests limited email infrastructure on the domain. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades to mitigate risks and support business continuity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with romanian-companies.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review romanian-companies.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.