Skip to main content

Security report for roku.com

Roku · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roku is a prominent technology company specializing in streaming entertainment solutions, offering a platform and devices that enable users to stream thousands of channels to their TVs. The website reflects a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and professional design, targeting a broad general audience interested in streaming media. The company maintains multiple international technical support phone numbers and active social media channels, reinforcing its global reach and customer engagement. Technically, the website employs modern tracking technologies such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. However, explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies were not detected in the provided content, which could be improved to enhance compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of security headers and incident response information suggests areas for enhancement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to registry policies or privacy protection, which limits domain registration transparency but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the strong brand and content quality. Overall, Roku's website presents a professional and trustworthy front with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic enhancements in these areas would further solidify user confidence and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roku.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Roku operates as a leading player in the streaming technology sector, leveraging a platform-based business model that combines hardware sales with a vast ecosystem of streaming channels. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive channel offerings and user-friendly streaming devices. Revenue streams likely include device sales, advertising, and channel partnerships. The company targets a wide consumer base seeking convenient TV entertainment solutions. The presence of multiple international support contacts and social media engagement indicates a well-established global footprint. Growth indicators include continuous platform expansion and marketing investments. Partnerships with content providers and technology vendors are implicit in the ecosystem. The company's operations reflect a mature and scalable business with strong market positioning.

Security posture

The website's security posture is solid with mandatory HTTPS encryption and no apparent exposure of sensitive information. The use of reputable analytics and tag management tools is standard but requires careful configuration to avoid privacy risks. The lack of visible security headers and formal security policies or incident response contacts suggests moderate maturity in security governance. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not clearly demonstrated on the site, representing a compliance gap. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, which could impact rapid mitigation of security events. Overall, the security posture is good but would benefit from enhanced transparency and policy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to facilitate security issue reporting and resolution.
  4. Conduct regular security audits to ensure no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data exist on the site.
  5. Enhance accessibility and navigation clarity to improve user experience and SEO performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Roku
Description
Roku provides the simplest way to stream entertainment to your TV. On your terms. With thousands of available channels to choose from.
Key services
Streaming entertainment to TV, Thousands of available channels
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found in provided content.
  4. Contact information is present in structured data with multiple international support phone numbers.
  5. Website uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing.
  6. Content is professional, focused on streaming entertainment, and safe for general audiences.
  7. No forms detected in provided HTML snippet; data collection via forms not evident.
  8. No explicit security policies, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. SSL is enabled and presumably well configured given HTTPS usage.
  10. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integration of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics purposes. The HTML is well-structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter Cards). Mobile optimization is good, and the site loads with moderate performance. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The absence of forms in the provided content suggests limited direct data collection on this page. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and privacy policy pages indicates areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 87/100 +21Low22 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roku.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roku.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.