Skip to main content

Security report for roivenue.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed URL leads to a robot challenge screen designed to verify visitor legitimacy before granting access to the main site content. This proof-of-work captcha page uses advanced JavaScript cryptographic functions and web workers to perform client-side challenges, indicating a moderate level of security sophistication. However, the actual website content is blocked by this security mechanism, preventing access to business-related information, privacy policies, or contact details. The domain roivenue.com is registered since 2014 with a stable registrar and no privacy protection, suggesting a legitimate registration history but lacks publicly available registrant details. The page is hosted behind AWS Cloudfront CDN, but no explicit security headers or SEO optimizations are present on the challenge page. Overall, the site demonstrates a security-first approach but lacks transparency and accessibility for end users at this stage.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roivenue.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the blocking security challenge, no direct business information, market positioning, or service descriptions are available. The domain age and registrar data indicate a stable presence since 2014. The challenge page targets general website visitors to prevent automated or malicious access. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The business model and revenue streams cannot be inferred from the challenge page alone. The lack of contact or policy pages limits assessment of customer engagement or compliance maturity.

Security posture

The site employs a custom proof-of-work captcha mechanism using cryptographic hashing and web workers to mitigate automated bot access, which is a strong security measure. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are presented, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The security score is moderate due to the advanced captcha but limited by missing standard security practices and transparency. The domain registration is consistent and stable, supporting legitimacy. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, DNSSEC, and clear privacy and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  4. Provide visible contact information and incident response channels for security reporting.
  5. Improve SEO and accessibility features to enhance user experience and site discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page is a robot challenge screen with proof-of-work captcha indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The page is a robot challenge screen checking site connection security.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Web Crypto API, SHA1 hashing, Web Workers
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of cryptographic challenge (proof-of-work captcha)
  • JavaScript-based client challenge

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a security challenge (captcha proof-of-work).
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies.
  3. No contact information or business details on the page.
  4. Page is minimal and designed to verify client legitimacy before access.
  5. Use of advanced JavaScript cryptographic challenge indicates moderate security sophistication.
  6. No SEO or accessibility optimizations detected.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is stable and consistent but lacks registrant identity details.
Technical notes

Notes

The technical infrastructure includes advanced client-side JavaScript cryptographic challenges using SHA1 hashing and Web Workers, indicating a modern approach to bot mitigation. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, providing reliable content delivery. The page is minimalistic and lacks SEO meta tags or structured data. Performance is moderate due to cryptographic computations on the client side. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA or semantic enhancements detected. No CMS or frameworks are identified beyond custom JavaScript. The technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in security headers and user experience improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roivenue.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roivenue.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.