Skip to main content

Security report for roedl.pl

Rödl & Partner · Other · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rödl & Partner is a large international professional services firm operating in Poland and globally, offering audit, legal, tax, consulting, and technology advisory services. The company has a strong market presence with offices in 50 countries and approximately 6000 employees. The website is built on Microsoft SharePoint and uses modern web technologies including jQuery and Matomo analytics. It provides comprehensive content, clear navigation, and multilingual support. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance evident through cookie consent and privacy policies. However, the absence of WHOIS data reduces domain registration trustworthiness, though the brand and content strongly indicate legitimacy. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roedl.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
83
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets business clients requiring audit, tax, legal, and consulting services, with a focus on sectors such as energy and new technologies. Rödl & Partner leverages a global network and partnerships such as GPSA to enhance service delivery. The business model is professional services with a strong emphasis on compliance, consulting, and technology integration. The website reflects a mature digital presence with active social media channels and regular content updates. The firm demonstrates trust through certifications like ISO 27001 and participation in industry rankings.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs Matomo analytics configured to respect do-not-track settings. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no dedicated security or incident response pages are found. The site uses SharePoint, which is a robust platform but requires proper configuration to avoid vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding security headers and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
  5. Investigate and resolve the lack of WHOIS data to improve domain registration trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rödl & Partner
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rödl & Partner
Description
Świadczymy usługi w obszarach Audyt, Business Process Outsourcing, Doradztwo prawne, Doradztwo podatkowe, Consulting, Nowe technologie, Cyberbezpieczeństwo.
Key services
Audyt, Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), Doradztwo prawne, Doradztwo podatkowe, Consulting, Nowe technologie i cyberbezpieczeństwo
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Microsoft SharePoint, jQuery 3.5.1, Matomo Analytics, ASPx controls
Frameworks
SharePoint CMS
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by SharePoint)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Matomo analytics configured with do-not-track
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Tag Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Uses Microsoft SharePoint as CMS platform.
  3. Strong international presence with multiple country offices.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  7. Social media presence is active with multiple verified platforms.
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Microsoft SharePoint CMS, leveraging ASPx controls and jQuery 3.5.1. It uses Matomo for analytics with advanced tracking features and respects user privacy preferences. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but is likely a Windows-based environment due to SharePoint usage. The site has a professional design and consistent branding, though some technical improvements could enhance security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roedl.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roedl.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.